Re: [deal.II] LineMinimization and p-Laplace

2021-05-05 Thread J.Y. Merten
Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 5:31:44 PM UTC+2 J.Y. Merten wrote: > Hi Jean, > > f and g are build correctly according to the manual but I don't understand > why it still stagnates in the third iteration (please see the attached > log). And > &g

Re: [deal.II] LineMinimization and p-Laplace

2021-04-28 Thread J.Y. Merten
. Best wishes, Julie On Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 8:36:03 PM UTC+2 J.Y. Merten wrote: > Hi Jean, > > I was thinking the same. I have followed the example in the namespace > reference of LineMinimization > <https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/namespaceLineMinimiza

Re: [deal.II] LineMinimization and p-Laplace

2021-04-20 Thread J.Y. Merten
ve a look at it in the coming days to see if I can > work out what’s going on. > > Best, > Jean-Paul > > > On 15. Apr 2021, at 12:08, J.Y. Merten wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am trying to solve a p-Laplace Dirichlet problem with zero boundary and > used step-15

[deal.II] LineMinimization and p-Laplace

2021-04-15 Thread J.Y. Merten
Dear all, I am trying to solve a p-Laplace Dirichlet problem with zero boundary and used step-15 as the base. The code works well for p=1.1-2.9 with Newton and standard linesearch procedure. But when p>=3 the program diverges, continuation method brought me to p=2.99 but not beyond. Recently I