iter = *this;
^
make: *** [all] Error 2
Could you give me some instructions about that? Thank you!
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
Houston, Texas 77204-5008
346-404-2062
--
The deal.I
dealii-9.2.0/source/dofs/dof_tools_sparsity.cc:689:3:
note: template void
dealii::DoFTools::make_flux_sparsity_pattern(const DoFHandlerType&,
SparsityPatternType&)
make_flux_sparsity_pattern(const DoFHandlerType &dof,
^
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:28 PM Timo Heister wrote:
>
Dear Bruno,
Ok, I will try a new gcc for compilation. Thank you!
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:57 AM Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> Yuesu Lin,
>
> Do you have access to a newer compiler? gcc 4.8.5 is very old.
>
> Best,
>
> Bruno
>
> On Wednesday, July 22, 2020 at 11:26:0
Dear all,
The problem has been solved. The GCC version was too old to compile the
new version of deal.ii. I changed the gcc to a newer version which gave a
very good result. Thanks!
Best regards
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:56 AM yuesu jin wrote:
> Dear Bruno,
> Ok, I will try a new g
- Could not find a sufficient PETSC installation: PETSC is compiled
against a different MPI library than the one deal.II picked up.
-- DEAL_II_WITH_PETSC has unmet external dependencies.
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Eart
Dear Bruno,
Thank you very much! I am using mpi/gcc right now. I will change to
Intel mpi library.
Best regards
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Bruno Turcksin
wrote:
> Yuesu Jin,
>
> You don't need to compile your own PETSc but you need to use the same MPI
> library than t
RS: *** Required variable
"PETSC_INCLUDE_DIR_ARCH" set to NOTFOUND ***
-- Could NOT find PETSC
-- DEAL_II_WITH_PETSC has unmet external dependencies.
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
Houston, Tex
SC_DIR}/lib64.
> See if you can adjust PETSC_DIR accordingly.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> Am Fr., 24. Juli 2020 um 01:18 Uhr schrieb yuesu jin >:
>
>> Dear all,
>> I am installing deal.ii with petsc on a cluster. After I compiled the
>> petsc library (The arch fol
Dear all,
This problem has been solved. I copied the petscversion.h file to the
arch/include folder therefore cmake found all petsc files and finished
compilation.
Best regards
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 3:17 PM yuesu jin wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
> Thank you for the instruction! I ga
Dear all,
I am working on an elastic wave simulation code which needs to set up
receivers on the surface boundaries to record the waveform. In this case,
how can I link the point coordinate with the dof handlers and extract
values from the solution vector? Thank you!
Best regards,
--
Yuesu
corresponding degree of freedom.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> Am So., 26. Juli 2020 um 16:58 Uhr schrieb yuesu jin >:
>
>> Dear all,
>> I am working on an elastic wave simulation code which needs to set up
>> receivers on the surface boundaries to record the wavef
igure
deal.II with METIS.
This message does't appear when I use a single node to run it. Does the
sparsity tools automatically overload to partition_metis under parallel
case?
Thank you!
Best regards
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
Univers
> Best,
> David
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:37 AM yuesu jin wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> I am running step-17 by mpirun, it returns the error message below:
>> **
gives 2*9+4*1=22 degrees of freedom, it equals the base
function with the vector components.
[image: image.png]
u(0) should have two base element [phi(0),0] and [phi(0) 0], u(1) should
have two base elements as well [0 phi(0)] [0 phi(1)], so here should be 4
rather than 2 degrees of freedom.
Best r
s.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/3c3bd51a-eaf4-49ce-af0f-fd6477100123o%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
Houston, Texas 77204-5008
346-404-2062
--
The deal.
group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/feed2cda-81f9-4e22-8089-beaf9b2ae2b0o%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University o
Dear all,
I want to set up one Dirchlet boundary condition and one Neumann boundary
condition on a 2d mesh, which is generated by gmsh. How can I set up the
mesh file in order to tell dealii with the boundary id when I input the
.msh file into dealii? Thanks!
Best regards,
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D
ulate a Taylor-Couette flow.
> If you wanted to use a 3D mesh, then you would make a Physical Volume(0)
> and you would use the Physical Surface for the boundary conditions
>
> Best
> Bruno
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 5 August 2020 20:36:09 UTC-4, yuesu jin wrote:
>>
>>
t the
locally_owned_dofs_per_subomain, we can already use this_mpi_process to
access the partition vector, which means the subdomain partition has been
done according to the n_mpi_processes.
Best regards,
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Departme
preconditioner in the parallel version is blockJacobi but the single thread
version I used is SSOR. Does it matter to the convergence? Thank you!
Best regards,
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
regards,
Yuesu
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:14 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/14/20 5:53 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> >
> > I also wrote a single thread CG version, which converges well. The
> > preconditioner in the parallel version is blockJacobi but the single
> thread
&g
I directly set up the matrix and rhs
vector as complex ? Why does step-29 says "*it is often more
convenient to split complex valued functions into their real and imaginary
parts and use separate scalar finite element fields for discretizing each
one of them*" ?
Best wishes,
--
Yuesu
ause you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "deal.II User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/de
regards,
Yuesu
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 7:20 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/14/20 9:20 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> > I tried a few levels of the tolerance, 1e-3, 1e-4 ,1e-6 and 1e-8. 1e-3
> > converged because that is in the same level with the solution. Error
> occurs
> > b
Sure, I will add my progress following this email.
Best regards,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 7:47 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/16/20 6:38 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> > Thank you very much! I found step-62 yesterday and I have
> compared the
> > difference between them. I
Dear Dr.Bangerth,
I did nothing to verify those properties. because the single thread CG
solver converged well. I used different preconditioners in parallel
version and single thread version. In the parallel version I used block
Jacobi and in the single thread version I used Jacobi. How can I
OK, I see. I will do it, thank you! I will let you know if I get any result.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:06 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/17/20 6:01 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> > I did nothing to verify those properties. because the single thread
> CG
> > solver conv
categories. Could
you give me the documentation page about these two functions?
Best regards,
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
Houston, Texas 77204-5008
346-404-2062
--
The deal.II project
the gradient of the non-zero component in
the vector shape function such that it is a vector?
Thank you again!
Best regards,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:11 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 9/3/20 1:28 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> >I am working on vector value finite element modeling. I
Dear Dr. Bangerth,
I read the step.20 again. It solves my question. I didn't understand what
the non-primitive element talks about, now I know the necessity of that.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Yuesu
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 5:38 PM yuesu jin wrote:
> Dear Dr. Bangerth,
> Thank you v
Dear all,
I want to contract the gradient tensor with another vector, such as
T_ij*n_j, the gradient tensor is d_j u_i (d is the partial differential
operator). I am wondering what is the first index of gradient tensor, i or
j? Thank you !
Best regards,
Yuesu
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student
Dear Dr.Bangerth,
I found it just before, it is on the page of FEValuesView (
https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classFEValuesViews_1_1Vector.html).
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Yuesu
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:00 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 9/7/20 6:21 PM, yuesu
-1
actually. Could you tell me what's wrong with my mesh generation?
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
Houston, Texas 77204-5008
346-404-2062
y indicator to a line: the line
>> with end vertices -1 and 0 does not exist.*
>> --------
>>
>> I attached the gmsh .geo file in this email. There is no vertex -1
>> actually. Could you tell me what's wrong with my mesh
the physical groups for the curves and the
> points. This means nothing in deal.II. A vertex does not have a
> boundary ID. You need all the external surfaces and the volume to have
> a physical group. That's it.
>
> Bruno
>
> Le mar. 22 sept. 2020 à 10:24, yuesu jin a écrit
quot;) because it was the only
> difference with my .geo files.
>
> Bruno
>
> Le mar. 22 sept. 2020 à 11:20, yuesu jin a écrit :
> >
> > Dear Bruno,
> > The problem was solved after I removed the
> 'SetFactory("OpenCASCADE")'. Here are two
Hi, all,
I am a novice of deal.II, I begun to learn deal.II since version 9.0.1,
after I updated it from 9.0.1 to 9.1.1, I found the executable file cannot
run, the message is:
./step-5_sec: symbol lookup error:
/home/yjin6/anaconda3/lib/libmkl_intel_lp64.so: undefined symbol:
mkl_blas_dsyrk.
ed
make: *** [install] Error 1
***
I cannot figure out what is wrong there, can you tell me what is the
problem? Thanks a lot!
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:58 PM yuesu jin wrote:
> Hi, all,
> I am a novice of deal.II, I begun to learn deal.II since version 9.0.1,
> after I
e53%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/fa4a34b5-70c9-4a8a-accb-dfc96cab1e53%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmo
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your reply. I misunderstood build and install. I thought
after I setup the build folder and make install, the program should be
compiled in that build folder, because I installed the 9.0.1 version just
run the command as those in README file. Now, I first input
*cmake -DC
AH... I understand,* cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=[Directory you want to
install] [Directory you build the program]*
I have installed it again in a new folder, the folder now is 3.6GB, which
means something has been installed in that. But the message is still there:
/libmkl_intel_lp64.so: undefined symbol:
mkl_blas_dsyrk*
I try to fix it .
Best regards,
Yuesu
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 AM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/11/19 9:08 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> > AH... I understand,/*cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=[Directory you want
> to
> > insta
. It really
cost my time!
Best regards,
Yuesu
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:12 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/12/19 11:01 AM, yuesu jin wrote:
> >
> > Installation completed, what a stupid mistake I made! Appreciate for
> > your support!
> > All the p
system_matrix
and system_rhs. Do those two procedure have the same effect?
---
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,
Houston, Texas 77204-5008
346-404-2062
--
The deal.II project is located at
d stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/a9e938ad-06b6-49e1-9e99-91bafd4e8fc4%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/a9e938ad-
Hi all,
When we iterate the cell within triangulation/dof_handler, we often use
functions such as cell->face(), cell->vertices() etc. Where can I find all
the member function in our documentation webpage? Thanks a lot!
--
Yuesu Jin,
Ph.D student,
University of Houston,
College of N
t is here:
> https://dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classDoFCellAccessor-members.html
> (DofCellAccessor)
>
> Best,
>
> Bruno
>
> On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 10:42:00 PM UTC-4, yuesu jin wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> When we iterate the cell within triangulati
Hi all,
I have a question about the constructor initialization list. In some
tutorials, we initialize the dof_handler in the constructor with parameter
triangulation, however, the triangulation is initialized in some member
function within this class, which means when we initialize the class, we
Hope that helps.
>
> Best,
> Konrad
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:44:24 AM UTC+2, yuesu jin wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a question about the constructor initialization list. In some
>> tutorials, we initialize the dof_handler in
49 matches
Mail list logo