Hi James,
> I was going through the code and attempted to integrate it within
Step-44 as appropriate. I appreciate your willingness to share it with
me, but I have some questions concerning error messages that were made
when I tried to implement it.
You're welcome!
> The last portion of the
I apologize that it took so long to respond Jean-Paul, as some things came
up that kept me away from working on this.
I was going through the code and attempted to integrate it within Step-44
as appropriate. I appreciate your willingness to share it with me, but I
have some questions concerning
Dear James,
I've got some snippets of code that I'll post below to show you how this
can be done within the framework of step-44. The basic concept that I
implemented is as follows:
- The nonlinear solver is called by some function who's job it is to
solve for a single timestep. Collective
deal.ii users,
I'm learning deal.ii with the goal of using it to non-linear solid
mechanics problems. In many of these problems (such as Step-44), a time
step is used to move a calculation from the initial condition to the final
loaded state.
Step-44 uses a uniform time-step, but there are ins
