Re: [deal.II] Raviart-Thomas elements on shells in 3D

On 11/15/23 13:57, Marc BAKRY wrote: I won't hesitate. At the moment, I tried to change the template from to and to make the corresponding changes in the FERaviartThomas class; however it seems that it is not /that/ easy (I triggered /a lot/ of errors at compile time, among them in the FET

Re: [deal.II] Raviart-Thomas elements on shells in 3D

I won't hesitate. At the moment, I tried to change the template from to and to make the corresponding changes in the FERaviartThomas class; however it seems that it is not *that* easy (I triggered *a lot* of errors at compile time, among them in the FETools namespace). As an intermediate step, I

Re: [deal.II] Raviart-Thomas elements on shells in 3D

If you need any help, feel free to reach out to the deal.II community, we are always glad to help On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 10:37:42 a.m. UTC-5 M. Bakry wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > thanks very much for your answer. I think I will give it a try when I > find some time. Non-C1 manifolds are

Re: [deal.II] Raviart-Thomas elements on shells in 3D

Dear Wolfgang, thanks very much for your answer. I think I will give it a try when I find some time. Non-C1 manifolds are not an issue in the framework of the BEMs. One can, for example, take a look at this reference . Best regards, M. Le sam. 4 nov. 2023 à

Re: [deal.II] Raviart-Thomas elements on shells in 3D

On 11/3/23 15:06, M. Bakry wrote: - it seems that the Piola transform is implemented for the 'codimension=1' case (according to the templatization). Could codim=1 RT elements be implemented by computing the RT on the reference quad then by applying the corresponding Piola transform ? Marc --

[deal.II] Raviart-Thomas elements on shells in 3D

Dear all, Raviart-Thomas elements are often used in the framework of boundary integral equations in electromagnetics, for example when solving the Electric Field Integral Equation (see this reference , p. 244 for example). The FE spaces