[deal.II] Re: Using constraints for already assembled RHS

2017-03-13 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hello, I found out the solution and wanted to post here in case some one faces similar problem. In my case, the right hand side was already assembled and there was no way that it could be assembled during the calculations as done usually. Think of it as reading an assembled rhs (without applicat

[deal.II] Re: Using constraints for already assembled RHS

2016-09-12 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hi Daniel, Thanks for the reply. This indeed is one way of doing it. I was wondering if there is any other way in which this can be done. Thanks again. On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 5:04:47 AM UTC-4, Daniel Arndt wrote: > > Rajat, > > The first equation is the usual equilibrium equation.

[deal.II] Re: Using constraints for already assembled RHS

2016-09-12 Thread Daniel Arndt
Rajat, The first equation is the usual equilibrium equation. It is solved to give > displacements. The stiffness matrix is then multiplied by this global > displacement vector to give the global traction vector which forms the rhs > for the second equation. > The easiest solution to deal with c