Prof. Wolfgang,
Thank you for the concern and response. I got your
point there. I will try it in this way then. :)
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 6:38:53 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> On 8/5/19 3:40 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > The only thing is that I was
On 8/5/19 3:40 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> The only thing is that I was wondering if I might be using extra processing
> and memory by defining the fe_temperature, dof_handler_temperature and
> fe_values_temperature by defining them again in the solid mechanics program.
> And if I am, then
Dear Prof. Wolfgang,
Thank you for your concern and
understanding.
Yes you are right. I tried something similar instead of copying the
triangulation.
I used *const SmartPointer >* to transfer
triangulation between both thermal and the solid mechanics classes
On 8/2/19 4:01 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
>
> considering the above scenario as well as the concerns, I would be grateful
> to
> receive any suggestion from your side. Hope I am clear in my description.
> Waiting for your kind response. Thank you in advance!
Instead of copying
On 5/24/19 2:46 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> Thank you for informative reply and posting this concern on the forum. I am
> also interested in thermoelastic problem and new use of deal.ii.
> My question is that other than the tutorial steps 26 & 18 or 20,21 & 22, is
> there pre-developed
