May 9



TEXAS:

Bluntson's attorney speaks on death penalty


Death penalties are rare, but they could become a thing of the past believes one of the attorneys who represented Demond Bluntson.

For nearly 25 years, Webb County had not seen a death penalty case, but that changed on Thursday when the jury condemned Demond Bluntson to death.

The Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, a state grassroots advocacy organization, estimates about 537 people have been executed in the state since 1982.

They report that new death sentence have dropped nearly 80 % since 1999.

Attorney Eduardo Pena who represented Bluntson says he thinks the decline is part of a trend that would mirror eastern countries.

"Public opinion is changing away from the death penalty. Most of Europe has already prohibited the death penalty. And, I think eventually that's what we will do in the United States. I think that is the direction in which we are headed", said Pena.

Pena says death penalty cases can be costly and lengthy because of the years they can be delayed in the appeal process.

Demond Bluntson will be appealing his sentence.

(source: KGNS news)






PENNSYLVANIA:

DA finishes 1st week in Allen Wade death penalty trial


Highlights of week 1 include surveillance video of a man who prosecutors say is Allen Wade withdrawing $600 from Sarah's Wolfe's bank account from an ATM, and also using Susan Wolfe's debit card to buy cigarettes hours after the 2 were shot to death.

Pittsburgh homicide detective Wade Sarver testified he spent over 40 hours reviewing and compiling surveillance videos from businesses near the East Liberty branch of the Carnegie Library, where police found Sarah Wolfe's green Ford Fiesta on February 8, 2014, the day after their bodies were discovered by Sarah's boyfriend.

Wade is charged with the Feb. 6, 2014 beating and shooting-death of Sarah and Susan Wolfe. In a March 5, 2014 statement Wade said, "I am 100 % innocent," and added that allegations by police that his DNA was found on a pair of gray sweatpants "is a bunch of bull."

Most of the footage shows a figure dressed in a red jacket with a blue long-sleeve shirt underneath, gray sweatpants and white tennis shoes that have a distinctive flap, walking in the area of the Carnegie Library and the Citizens Bank ATM where the withdrawal attempts were made.

The Citizen Bank's ATM camera shows a male figure with his face obscured, making repeated withdrawal attempts between 12:44 and 12:53 a.m. on Feb. 7, 2014. A glove covered the man's right hand, but he could be seen putting a receipt into his left hand.

Justin Hanna an investigator with Citizens Bank told the jury that after several attempts a $600 withdrawal was completed at 12:46 a.m. from Sarah Wolfe's bank account, and several unsuccessful attempts at withdrawing $300 from Susan Wolfe's bank account were made during the same time period at the ATM.

Video from cameras at a nearby apartment complex and a Target department store show the same figure walking near the library, a Midas Muffler and in front of the ATM.

A video from an East Liberty Sunoco gas station shows a man wearing a pair of white tennis shoes with what appears to be the same flap, walk into the store shortly after 1:00 a.m. and purchase 2 packs of Newport cigarettes.

Prosecutors allege that Wade made the purchase with Susan Wolfe's PNC Bank debit card.

Pittsburgh police officer Gregory McGee told the jury Wednesday how he decided to search the area near where Sarah Wolfe's car was found. "I felt it was a strange area to leave a car and that someone may have fled on foot leavingevidence," he said.

Walking down South Whitfield Street near the library, Officer McGee noticed a black knit cap lying on top of some mulch off the sidewalk and about 60 feet down the street he saw a pair of gray sweatpants. Prosecutors allege that Wade was wearing a red jacket, gray sweatpants and white tennis shoes when he killed Sarah and Susan Wolfe.

Officer McGee told the jury that as he picked up the sweatpants a white business card fell out of a pocket that belonged to Cameron Mager, a social worker who prosecutors allege had been treating Susan.

Mr. Mager told jurors Thursday the business card was his and testified that he is "100 % certain" Wade was never his client. He also told the jury that his office phone number and email, which are listed on his business cards, are not publicly available.

Police also recovered a pair of socks from a trash can near the sweatpants, that prosecutors say has both Wade and Sarah Wolfe's DNA on them. Wade's DNA was also found on the sweatpants prosecutors say.

Pittsburgh homicide detective George Satler told jurors that Sarah Wolfe's boyfriend was "extremely cooperative" when he was questioned shortly after he found the bodies of Sarah and Susan Wolfe in the basement of their Pittsburgh home on February 7, 2014.

Public Defender Lisa Middleman alleged Monday in her opening argument to the jury, that investigators failed to fully investigate Matthew Buchholz's alibi as to where he was the evening of Feb. 6, the night Assistant District Attorney William Petulla said Allen Wade "savagely" beat Susan Wolfe and shot her and her sister Sarah Wolfe in the head.

Mr. Buchholz who had been dating Sarah for 8 months according to court testimony, provided very detailed information as to where he was at and who he was with that evening detective Satler testified. "He seemed he was mourning the loss of his girlfriend."

"Could he have been acting; could he have been lying - yes," Satler responded on questioning by Ms. Middleman. However, detective Satler maintained based upon his experience and having conducted hundreds of interviews in homicide cases, he believed Mr. Buchholz was being truthful.

Detective Satler admitted that he had not searched Mr. Buchholz's car or asked him to provide any receipts from the bar and restaurant Mr. Buchholz said he was at during the time prosecutors say the sisters were killed.

When he was first interviewed by police during a canvass of the neighborhood Allen Wade was chain smoking Newport cigarettes Pittsburgh police officer Thomas Leheny testified Friday morning.

Leheny also testified that he saw a pair of white tennis shoes in Wade's home when he spoke to him, however, he was not able to confirm they are the same tennis shoes that are shown in the videos.

On Friday jurors also heard testimony from Jean-Paul Martin, chief technology officer and co-founder of Alarm.com,, who said records indicate that the front door to the Wolfes' house showed it opened and closed 5 times between 7:26 p.m. and 9:54 p.m. Feb. 6, 2014.

The last witness to testify Friday was Doreen Oshlag, Director of Early Childhood Development at the Hilel Academy where Susan Wolfe worked as a teacher's aide. Ms. Oshlag told the jury "If she would have been five minutes late she would have texted me. She was always on time."

Ms. Oshlag called the police late in the morning on Feb. 6. 2014 because Susan had not called or shown up for work that day.

The trial is expected to last at least 2 more weeks and Wade faces the death penalty if convicted.

(source: digitaljournal.com)






FLORIDA:

New motion filed by Donald Smith----In regards to Cherish Perrywinkle case

Donald Smith filed a new motion Friday to prevent him from getting the death penalty under the new sentencing statute.

In the motion, he argues the court can not apply a new criminal statute retroactively. He argues the court must apply the law in effect at the time of the crime, which was in 2013.

This year, the Supreme Court ruled Florida's death penalty in effect in 2013 was unconstitutional.

Smith argues the maximum sentence he can received is life in prison with no chance for parole.

His next court date is May 26th.

(source: news4jax.com)

*******************

Death row worse than execution


I worked Dade County Homicide for 16 of my 30 years as an investigator. I saw criminal carnage close up, many hundreds of times. I'm no bleeding heart. But we have to change how we handle capital crimes.

Death row is a fate worse than death. We rarely acknowledge that. We mainly focus on criminals paying for a crime with their life. We don't care about the interim torture element.

Timothy McVeigh waived all appeals for his death sentence after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. It still took 6 years to carry out the sentence. In truth, he considered death far more desirable than rotting in a hot, tiny cell 1,440 minutes a day for decades.

So is it really punishment? Everlasting sleep is far more humane than lifeless life in a concrete cell. When we relegate suffering pets to die by the veterinarian needle, we call that "humane." For inmates, it's "punishment."

Brandon Jones, age 72, was executed in Georgia earlier this year after 36 years awaiting execution day after day confined amid steel and concrete without social interaction. There are hundreds of similar stories.

Viva Leroy Nash was 83 when he died of natural causes, after 27 years on Arizona's death row. He was deaf, nearly blind and suffered from dementia. But who cares?

Our president and millions of liberal-minded folks say that waterboarding terrorists is considered torture, even for those preparing to kill thousands of Americans with one bomb. But is it not torture to lock someone 23 to 24 hours a day in sweltering solitary confinement for 10, 20 or 30 years, driving some to insanity?

Florida's Supreme Court will soon address death sentences based on the new requirement for jury majorities that must now vote 10 out of 12 in favor before the death sentence can be imposed. Many of Florida's 389 death row inmates may have sentences commuted to life. What then? New sentencing for every death row inmate? Eligibility for parole? Will other inmates and/or guards be at risk, knowing the lifers have nothing to lose?

Appeals for capital cases can drag on for several decades. According to most studies, the legal morass of maintaining the death penalty in America is 2 to 3 times more costly to taxpayers than life sentences.

But the greatest peril of capital punishment is the risk to innocents who may wrongly suffer from a flawed legal system.

We've seen such prosecutorial incompetence in Brevard County, when William Dillon agonized 27 years in a prison cell an innocent man, and Wilton Dedge, the same fate for 22 years. DNA proved their innocence, though their prime of life can never be recaptured. Other evidentiary signals existed about their cases which police and prosecutors should have seen as red flags pointing to possible innocence, but "winning" was more important than justice. Had these men been executed, they would have been buried as hardened criminals.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, 156 death row inmates have been exonerated since 1973 based on new acquittals or dismissed charges. 20 were found innocent based on DNA evidence. 25 exonerations came from Florida's death row.

The source lists 13 other executions in which there are strong indications that the deceased inmate had been innocent. That includes Florida's Leo Jones, executed in 1998.

2943 inmates now occupy death row cells in 33 states. Florida is ranked 2nd behind Texas, with 396. Hypothetically, if only 1/2 of 1 % of the inmates awaiting execution are actually innocent, that means we're preparing to wrongly execute 15 people. 1 would be too many. There is no argument that can justify that.

The system is too imperfect to be taking human life.

It's time to end the risks and complications and do what 98 % of the industrialized world has done; Abolish capital punishment and establish an offense-based tier system for housing dangerous inmates serving life without parole. It will reduce costs and likely save innocent lives.

What's more important?

(source: Guest Columnist; Marshall Frank is an author and retired Miami police detective----Florida Today)

***************

"Dead man Walking" nun still fighting to end executions


In 1981, Sister Helen Prejean moved into the infamous St. Thomas housing project near the Mississippi River in New Orleans as part of her order's outreach mission called Hope House. She was in her early 40s.

St. Thomas was a violent, poor, predominantly black neighborhood stretching along Tchoupitoulas Street that the locals came to call "The Killing Fields." It was an eye-opening experience for Prejean, who had grown up as the privileged daughter of a white lawyer in Baton Rouge.

"The 1st day I walked into the projects, I said, 'Whoa. This is it, boy. This where all the gunshots go,'" Prejean said late last week on the phone from her home in Louisiana. "But I walked in and people greeted me. They loved the (Catholic) sisters there. ... But when I got in my bed that night, I made sure that my bed was below that window sill. Sister Lillian had a bullet come through her room and went through 4 of her best skirts. She was so p.o.'d by that. It got her good skirts."

Prejean, 77, let out a loud and hearty laugh, which is not really what one expects from the nation's leading advocate for abolishing the death penalty.

At the St. Thomas projects, Prejean quickly got a front-row introduction to abject poverty and its deadly consequences. As she later wrote in an essay published in Salt of the Earth magazine: "It didn't take long to see that for poor people, especially poor black people, there was a greased track to prison and death row."

"I saw the injustice and it struck the fire in my heart," Prejean said.

Her next step took her to Louisiana State Penitentiary where she became a spiritual adviser for convicted killers Patrick Sonnier and Robert Lee Willie, who were waiting on death row. Prejean wrote about being an eye-witness to execution in the Pulitzer Prize-nominated memoir "Dead Man Walking" (1993), which was later made into an Oscar-winning movie with Sean Penn and Susan Sarandon.

"That little book is still doing good work," said Prejean, who has been nominated 3 times for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Prejean will discuss "Dead Man Walking" and her life's work during the "Steppin' Out With The Innocence Project of Florida" gala and dinner on Thursday evening at Mission San Luis, 2100 W. Tennessee St. She said the visit is part of her mission to keep the flaws, failures and injustices of the death penalty in the public eye.

"The American people aren't wedded to the death penalty at all. They just don't think about it because it doesn't touch them," Prejean said. "The whole idea behind doing the talks, the whole idea behind the film 'Dead Man Walking' is to wake up the people. Bring them close to something they would never, otherwise, have the chance to see or experience. Not just buy into the general rhetoric that, 'Oh, yeah, he was a convict and he deserved to die.'"

When Prejean was asked if the death penalty would ever be justified in certain egregious cases - like Tallahassee's most infamous serial killer Ted Bundy, for example - Prejean didn't miss a beat.

"It moves you right to the question, 'Who is going to decide that? Who are the deciders of the worst of the worst?' The Green River Killer, who murdered 32 people, got a life sentence because he agreed to show where the victims were buried. He doesn't get the penalty while others do? So, who gets to decide that? It's a broken system."

Not everyone is keen to see Prejean's abolition movement succeed. One recent email from a critic, which she shared with CNN reporter Moni Basu, read: "There has not been one instance on the planet where an executed convict ever committed another homicide. The U.S. justice system is the fairest in the world. If you are judged guilty by a jury of your peers based on the evidence presented that is the way it works. If you do not like it then get out of the country."

Not one to hide from criticism, Prejean asked her staff to post the email to her website.

Outside the prison walls, Prejean has taken her anti-death penalty campaign to the highest office of the Catholic Church. In January, she traveled to Vatican City in Rome to deliver a thank-you letter to the pope from death row inmate Richard Glossip, whose execution in Oklahoma was halted following pleas from Pope Francis.

"He is just everything he seems to be. ... His heart is so in it," Prejean said. "He so hears the cries of poor people and vulnerable people. His heart is really with him. He's a bloomin' miracle."

Similar to Pope Francis, Prejean, starting the day she moved to the Thomas housing project, decided to dedicate her life to the downtrodden, outcasts and less fortunate people of the world.

"Look at who Jesus hung out with: lepers, prostitutes, thieves - the throwaways of his day," Prejean wrote in her essay from in Salt of the Earth "If we call ourselves Jesus' disciples, we too have to keep ministering to the marginated, the throwaways, the lepers of today. And there are no more marginated, thrown-away, and leprous people in our society than death-row inmates."

The essay was bluntly titled: "Would Jesus pull the switch?"

If you go ...

What: Talk by Sister Helen Prejean at the "Steppin' Out With The Innocence Project of Florida" benefit and dinner

When: 7 p.m. Thursday; VIP reception starts at 6 p.m.

Where: Mission San Luis, 2100 W. Tennessee St.

Cost: $125 general public; $100 students and government employees

Contact: 561-6767 or visit www.floridainnocence.org

(source: Tallahassee Democrat)






ALABAMA----impending execution

Death row inmate Vernon Madison set to be executed


Death row inmate Vernon Madison is set to be executed on Thursday, May 12 at the Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore.

Madison was convicted for the 1985 shooting and killing of Mobile police officer Julius Shulte.

Madison, 65, is one of Alabama's longest serving inmates on death row. His execution is set for 6:30 on Thursday.

(source: WPMI news)






LOUISIANA:

Louisiana's Color-Coded Death Penalty


The last time a white person in Louisiana was executed for a crime against a black person was in 1752, when a soldier named Pierre Antoine Dochenet was hanged after attempting to stab 2 enslaved black women to death with his bayonet.

This is just one of many grim facts in a new report describing the history of capital punishment in Louisiana and analyzing the outcome of every death sentence imposed in that state since 1976, when the Supreme Court reversed its brief moratorium on executions and allowed them to resume.

Racism has always been at the heart of the American death penalty. But the report, in the current issue of The Journal of Race, Gender, and Poverty, drives home the extent to which capital punishment, supposedly reserved for the "worst of the worst," is governed by skin color.

In Louisiana, a black man is 30 times as likely to be sentenced to death for killing a white woman as for killing a black man. Regardless of the offender's race, death sentences are 6 times as likely - and executions 14 times as likely - when the victim is white rather than black.

The new report shows that Louisiana's death penalty isn't only consistently racist; it's also profoundly error-prone. Of the 155 death sentences the state has handed down and resolved since 1976, 28 resulted in executions. The other 127 - or 82 % - were later reversed. Since 2001, 2 people have been executed, while 53 have had their death sentences reversed.

These reversals are usually the result of major errors at trial that violate the defendant's constitutional rights, such as prosecutorial misconduct, improper jury instructions and incompetent lawyering. In most cases, the discovery of these errors resulted in the defendants' being removed from death row and receiving lesser sentences. In 9 of the cases, though, the defendant was fully exonerated of the crime and cleared of all charges.

Louisiana's record is terrifying, but other capital punishment states aren't much better. Nationwide, the reversal rate for resolved death sentences is 72 %, and while the average exoneration rate for death row inmates in other states is 1.8 % (less than 1/2 of Louisiana's rate), that still translates to a national total of 156 innocent people sentenced to death and later exonerated since 1973.

Even if capital punishment could be imposed with zero risk of racial bias or error, it would still be brutal, immoral and ineffective at deterring crime - as most countries have found. But with bias and error endemic to the death penalty in this country, how can the Supreme Court continue to uphold its constitutionality?

(source: Editorial, New York Times)






CALIFORNIA:

'Grim Sleeper' Lonnie Franklin never took a murder 'nap' and likely killed at least 25 say police


The California serial killer convicted of murdering 9 women and a teenage girl never really took the hiatus from homicide that earned him the tag 'The Grim Sleeper', according to officials. Lonnie David Franklin Jr. was dubbed the nickname because of a supposed gap of 14 years between a string of murders in the 1980s and a 2nd group of homicides that followed from 2002.

"I don't think he stopped killing," Los Angeles Detective Daryn Dupree told the Los Angeles Times.

Investigators believe Franklin is responsible for at least 25 murders, including 11 that occurred during the time frame that police initially believed was a "dormant" period for Franklin Jr.

The additional murders were connected to Franklin after he was charged with the other homicides, but prosecutors are worrying that adding on to the charges would only delay his conviction and would not increase the potential penalty against him. The other victims' families backed the decision not to prosecute the other cases, the LA Times also reports.

Now that Franklin has been convicted of 10 murders - and an attempted murder- his trial is now set to move into the penalty phase, in which the jury will determine whether to sentence him to the death penalty or a custodial sentence that will mean life in prison.

Authorities will use the penalty phase to present evidence of at least five additional murders to nudge the jury into a death sentence against California's most prolific serial killer. Families of the victims will also testify about their loss.

All of Franklin's victims were poor and black and most were young. They were all raped, shot in the chest and discarded in alleyways or dumpsters near the South Los Angeles home of the 1-time garbage truck driver. It wasn't until 2009 that investigators were able to use DNA evidence to finally track down Franklin, employing lab technology that was not available when the murders were committed.

Franklin's final death toll will likely never be known. Detectives found more than 1,000 photos and hundreds of hours of video in Franklin's house featuring women, many nude and in sexually suggestive poses, with several apparently appearing to be unconscious. Many of the women have never been identified or located.

(source: ibtimes.co.uk)

***************

Memo to Justice Breyer on CA Death Penalty


To: Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court

From: Joe Mathews

Re: Switch to decaf, dude

Just read your dissent from a U.S. Supreme Court decision turning down a challenge to the death penalty in California. You alone among the 8 justices wanted to hear the case. And after reading it, I've gotta give you some advice:

Chill.

I know you don't like the death penalty. I know you don't think it's unconstitutional. But California is not the place to make your legal stand.

You probably should know this. You were born and raised in San Francisco, a graduate of Lowell High. But then again, it's been a while since you lived here. So you're making your judgment based on legal briefs, and a very literal reading of California's law and constitution. And that's a big mistake - our law and constitution often has very little to do with what goes on here.

In fact, relying on the law could leave you with the misimpression that we have the death penalty here.

Don't worry. We don't.

Yes, it's on the books. But California has brilliantly made such a hash of the death penalty rules that we can't really put anyone to death. It's been more than a decade since we did so. And it's unlikely that we're going to start again anytime soon.

It's actually sort of brilliant. The death penalty is legal but no one is put to death. The best of both worlds! Even the folks on death row seem to like it. When voters were asked recently to throw out the death penalty, many of the people on death row publicly opposed eliminating the death penalty. They like the special treatment they get - especially access to lawyers and the ability to file appeals and challenge their convictions. Call it a win-win-win.

Your dissent, in a too-literal and academic way, thus completely misses this point. You think all the costs and delays are some sort of problem, instead of the lasting accommodation they represent.

"Put simply," you wrote, "California's costly administration of the death penalty likely embodies three fundamental defects ... serious unreliability, arbitrariness in application and unconscionably long delays." You also noted that more death row inmates had died or committed suicide than were executed by the state.

Your Honor, those are not defects - those are features. Our death penalty policy is working for us.

Shouldn't you be bothering Texas or Virginia or someplace where they actually put people to death?

(source: Joe Mathews, foxandhoundsdaily.com)

********************

Stunning 'Dead Man Walking' is a triumph for Fresno Grand Opera


Where to start in my praise of the tour de force performance Saturday night of Fresno Grand Opera's "Dead Man Walking"?

Perhaps in a way that isn't the most obvious. Let's focus on Suzanna Guzman. She played the mother of the death row inmate upon which the operatic adaptation of Sister Helen Prejean's book about capital punishment is focused. (Jake Heggie wrote the music and Terrence McNally the excellent libretto.)

In the 2nd act, Mrs. De Rocher, whose son, Joseph, is about to die by lethal injection for the murder of 2 Louisiana teenagers, has to say goodbye. He tells her he is sorry for making her go through this. She says to hush, that there is no reason to be apologize because he is innocent of the crime.

Caught in Guzman's grip, the moment danced between sobering and exhilarating.

In the deeply textured and emotionally soaring world of the production in which we've been steeped for more than 2 hours, however, both of these characters - and the audience - know he is guilty.

The son wants to tell the mother everything. She can't bear to hear that truth. The tension is palpable. In her vocals and body language, Guzman came across as so authentic at that moment - so frightened and stubborn and sad - that it transcended the artificiality of the theatrical experience.

Everything seemed to melt away for me: the people seated around me, my awareness of the stage and design of the show, even the sense of being in the Saroyan Theatre. In that moment, Mrs. De Rocher was real. I felt her pain. Caught in her grip, the moment danced between sobering and exhilarating.

Guzman is a good example of just how high a quality of an experience the Fresno company delivered. She has performed two starring roles at the Metropolitan Opera, including Maddalena in "Rigoletto," and done 39 productions with Los Angeles Opera. She brought to the Fresno stage a wealth of experience, a beautiful mezzo-soprano voice and - most important - a passion for the material that made it unforgettable.

By singling out Guzman, I don't mean to slight the 2 leading roles in "Dead Man Walking" nor the uniformly excellent supporting cast.

Laura Krumm, who played Sister Helen, offered a soaring and emotionally fierce performance. Christopher Magiera, as Joseph De Rocher, brought nuance and wrenching vocals to his role. Stage director Michael Mori brought it all together in a precise and understated, yet never sterile, way.

The terrific supporting performances are almost too numerous to praise, from Jeanine De Bique's moving 2nd-act duet as Sister Rose to James Callon's precisely surly prison chaplain.

Liisa Davila and Zeffin Quinn Hollis, as parents of one of the murdered teenagers, added a fire (and a balance in terms of the capital punishment issue) with their heartfelt takes on their roles.

Liliana Duque Pineiro's production design established a minimalist tone, including a simple but imposing set dominated by a diagonal slash of prison cell blocks.

Erik Vose's lighting design felt expert, including a stunning moment - directed exquisitely by Mori - in which the condemned man stands for a family portrait on his last night of life.

Tara Roe's costumes, from Sister Helen's bland wardrobe to De Rocher's bright orange jumpsuit, added to the texture of the production.

Heggie's music came to glorious life with the Fresno Grand Opera orchestra, sometimes heaving like a storm, other times zeroing in on the tenderness of just one soul, under conductor Ryan Murray.

2 critical notes: The prologue of the production, in which we see the murders, was too distant and vague for me, starting the show on a tentative note. And a technical issue meant no supertitles during the first act. You can't always foresee such difficulties, but I would have made the call to stop the show and fix the problem before proceeding. Supertitles are that important.

My only big disappointment was in the size of the audience. It was far too small for such an important and groundbreaking cultural event.

Yes, it was a busy weekend, and, yes, I realize that the subject matter might have sounded like a downer, especially on Mother's Day weekend. But if you didn't come out and see this production - and you're one of those who are in the habit of remarking to me that it's too bad that you have to go to San Francisco and Los Angeles to experience excellence - then I only have this to say: You really missed out.

Did the political beliefs of people in this region and their opinions about the efficacy of capital punishment affect the turnout? Perhaps. But even though Prejean has made a cause out of opposing the death penalty, her book (and this opera) are not 1-sided polemics. There are no easy answers.

When Prejean came to Fresno in March to talk about the opera, she called the death penalty a "secret ritual" far removed from the people in whose name it is carried out. "Dead Man Walking" on Saturday shined a great and powerful light on that ritual, and regardless of how you feel about the death penalty, it was an emotional and artistic wallop. That's what great art is about.

(source: Donald Munro, fresnobee.com)




_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to