Re: [Debconf-discuss] Follow-up: additional checks you can do

2006-05-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On 27 May 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff stated: > > > I'm more in favour of the trouble-maker part. I had a printed copy > > from Anibal because I was on the road in Mexico prior to DebConf and > > couldn't make a printout in time. If you would have asked, I would > > have c

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-29 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:57:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> > If I were to crack a key signing party, using Bubba's travel >> > documents, I too would swear up and down the street that he indeed >> > correctly and diligently veri

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-29 Thread Mauro Parra
Hello, On 5/26/06, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You _usually_ don't get your passport stamped? Really? In recent flights?I have never entered Mexico back without the Immigration seal.Yeah, depends on the mood of the one attending you.  True! And even by plane! Which I found extreme

Re: [Debconf-discuss] list of valid documents for KSPs (was: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys)

2006-05-29 Thread David Moreno Garza
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Regardless of this, I think it would be nice to have a document (wikipedia > article?) listing official documents of countries all over the world. KSP > attendants need not base their decissions on this, but could be useful > as background information. > > I

[Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-29 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On 27 May 2006, martin f. krafft spake thusly: > > >>Dear Manoj, dear fellow DDs, >> >>I guess I could have known that this experiment of mine would turn >>into a huge thread, unfortunately extending across two mailing >>lists. Thus, it is surely in order for me to apolo

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Alternative keysigning procedures

2006-05-29 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 06:40:28PM -0500, Andrew McMillan wrote: >On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 04:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >>On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: >> >>>I imagine an improved protocol for the keysigning, which is based on >>>an idea I overheard after the p

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Penny Leach wrote: > struck me as a little bit silly. Penny is clearly short for Penelope. Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language and usual english names and nicknames. > Perhaps this was my bad when I made the key & displayed a lack of foresight.

[Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 10:37:39PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On 27 May 2006, martin f. krafft spake thusly: > > From within the project, what matters is that everything you do > > within the project can be attributed to one and the same person: the > > same person that went through our NM pr

[Debconf-discuss] For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?

2006-05-29 Thread Christian Perrier
A lot of interesting ideas and views have been exchanged during the long thread about the KSP and related issues. We probably can at least thanks Manoj (and indirectly Martin Krafft) for being the initiator of that discussion. Indeed, this leads me to think that scheduling a BOF/talk *before* the

Re: [Debconf-discuss] For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?

2006-05-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.0802 +0200]: > A lot of interesting ideas and views have been exchanged during > the long thread about the KSP and related issues. We probably can > at least thanks Manoj (and indirectly Martin Krafft) for being the > initiator of that d