On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:26:53PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > - rather than publicly disclosing all the details, it may be possible to > identify somebody outside the DebConf team that all of us trust who can > gather the facts confidentially and report relevant facts publicly >
For information, I would be willing to do this as someone who's been previously involved in organising a DebConf, and on finding sponsors, but not involved in any way for the current (or previous couple of) DebConfs. However... > Does Debian itself have some independent audit process, for example, > that could be used to deal with this in a final manner? > We do not have something similar to this. The only time I can remember something like this was a audit of ballot papers for a vote. I'm also not convinced that there would be any requirement on anyone to actually respond to the audit. > The goal is not to shame or punish anybody, but to ensure the optimal > processes are followed in future and to ensure that trust is not put at > risk. And all of the above can wait until after DebConf. Organising one is stressful enough as it is. Neil _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss