On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:29:42AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I tend to side towards the first scheme. I think it is an extra burden
on us as organizers, but not an unnecessarily high one, and quite
compatible with the tasks we already perform.
That's why I was thinking to get people from
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:29:42AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Richard Darst dijo [Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 06:25:05PM -0500]:
...
I like the ideas brought up by Richard and Gunnar and would like to give
some comments form a past member of talk selection / scheduler team.
When preparing the schedule
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 01:59:47PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
I'm getting Pentabarf in shape for DebConf10,...
Thanks and good luck with this! =)
Proposed Debian status types (simply renaming the existing ones):
...
Proposed categories:
...
Proposed food preferences:
...
Proposed
I also like the idea, sadly I think it won't work with the current
workflow we have. As Andreas said:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:49:30AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
...
I doubt that this would work for DebConf - but I would
like to rise this problem: *If* we want to build topic related
Hi,
Since I know people will be interested in the status of the final
report, I thought I'd give a pre-meeting summary.
Everything is (as always) being updated here:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf9/FinalReport
We got the open day talks in. Still waiting for Sponsorship and
Fundraising
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010, Ana Guerrero wrote:
I want to highlight that a huge part of the schedule is the unofficial
track that is pretty much scheduled between the last 2 weeks before debconf
and a few hours before the event during the conference. Even if it is a bit
crazy for
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:49:30AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
The second thought I want to bring in is the (un)famous official /
inoffical talk concept. Last year I officially annouonced that I'm not
volunteering for the scheduler job if this completely confusing concept
is not dropped (you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Richard Darst wrote:
We got the open day talks in. Still waiting for Sponsorship and
Fundraising write-ups.
Marga agreed a bit ago to assemble it in scribus (unless she's gotten
too busy...). She's just waiting
-=| Ana Guerrero, Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:47:17PM +0100 |=-
Whatever penta says people always seems to be confused, if it were
possible
to have a wiki page linked in the top with every field explained a bit more
verbosely I think this problem could be minimized this, and hopefully, answer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
A draft for the sponsor pack is in SVN:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debconf-
data/dc10/sponsors/sponsorpack_no_photos.pdf
This draft is still lacking proofreading for the last two pages (Leslie has
been doing a great job proofreading the
10 matches
Mail list logo
