On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:29:58PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:20:35PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > If it isn't in the contract, we can not know for certain we'll be able
> > to camp. The responsible of Le Camp has a board behind of him who can
> > overrule him or he
On 23/11/12 20:29, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:20:35PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
>> If it isn't in the contract, we can not know for certain we'll be able to
>> camp. The responsible of Le Camp has a board behind of him who can overrule
>> him or he can decide for whatev
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:20:35PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> If it isn't in the contract, we can not know for certain we'll be able to
> camp. The responsible of Le Camp has a board behind of him who can overrule
> him or he can decide for whatever reason he is finally not happy with it.
> This
Hi,
All the you in this email are plural "you".
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 07:20:09PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > And also, the bid was presented with some assumptions that
> > later have not worked as expected. I was expecting the team (local and
> > global) working in g
Hi,
On Freitag, 23. November 2012, Brian Gupta wrote:
> If I am not mistaken hug is going to try and get Le Camp to agree to 1
> week, plus some reduction in the DebCamp week commitment (either
> length or committed buildings), and is authorized to sign a contract
> with such a reduction?
with an
