Eric Dantan Rzewnicki dijo [Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 08:37:29PM -0400]:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> > Hi all
> > * 2. Website meeting - Tammy, Raoul, Simon
>
> Other possibly relevant persons: wendar, tumbleweed, cate, edrz (me),
> (other past contributors
Hi Eric
On 15/09/2015 03:56, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> I don't know much about licenses. But, DebConf users will file bugs [0]
> if we make them pull anything (fonts, css, js, etc) from anywhere else.
> Which is to say I think we'll need to be able to serve our own copy of
> whatever we end
Hey
On 15/09/2015 02:37, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote:
>> Hi all
>> * 2. Website meeting - Tammy, Raoul, Simon
>
> Other possibly relevant persons: wendar, tumbleweed, cate, edrz (me),
> (other past contributors ...), ...
And
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-09-15 02:37 +0200]:
> For too long we've had (at least) 3 separate web facing systems:
> static site, wiki, conference management system (penta, summit,
> wafer(?)). The topics listed in 2. apply to each at least to some
> degree. Some of
On 15/09/2015 13:13, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 15/09/2015 12:54, Bernelle Verster wrote:
>> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
>> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
>> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki
On 15/09/2015 12:54, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
> still blank) [1].
>
> Two things:
>
Hi Bernelle (2015.09.15_12:54:48_+0200)
> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
> still blank) [1].
Yeah, that sounds
Hi Jonathan (2015.09.15_13:33:45_+0200)
> *ahem*, make that "Alternating between Wednesday and Thursday sounds
> reasonable".
So, looking at the dudle, 2 chairs who can make Wednesdays can't make
Thursdays. And the only person that seems to benefit from Thursday is
Jan-Marek.
Is the complication
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:54:48PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
> still blank)
So.. who's making a call on the dudle?
It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
still blank) [1].
Two things:
* Daylight savings
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bernelle (2015.09.15_12:54:48_+0200)
>> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
>> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
>> meeting tomorrow night? Please
11 matches
Mail list logo