Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf18 venue contract with NCTU

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 06:09:39PM +0800, cctseng wrote: > Dear ChangZhou, > > Enclosed please find the confirmation letter and a list of the venue and > accommodation NCTU will support. > Do these two documents fulfill the request of DebConf committee? > Please let me know if the committee needs

Re: [Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

also sprach martin f krafft [2017-05-15 15:57 +0200]: > I think you are referring to the currently valid CoC: > > https://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml Ftr, since there's some confusion… this is the current CoC. The original proposal is available here:

Re: [Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2017-05-15 15:37 +0200]: > I also don't like such list. First, who will enforce it? DPL? > Anti-harassment or organizers? This — incidence response — is in part what we have to define. Someone needs to have the power to enforce the rules, attendees

Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC

also sprach Laura Arjona Reina [2017-05-15 15:22 +0200]: > The reason I said in my first mail: > > "The third paragraph, about the measures that can be taken, I need > to think about it a little bit more." I am sorry, I missed that. > And after thinking more, and cate's

Re: [Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

[using this mail to reply Martin, so that I have all CC] > El 15/05/17 a las 15:07, martin f krafft escribió: >> The original proposal listed a number of potential consequences to >> offences, among other more concrete incidence response processes. >> >> What's the reason you didn't include those

[Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

Resending CC'ing anti-harassment, so the anti-harassment team has the whole thread. Regards Mensaje reenviado Asunto: Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC Fecha: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:22:32 +0200 De: Laura Arjona Reina Responder a: larj...@debian.org

Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC

El 15/05/17 a las 15:07, martin f krafft escribió: > Dear Laura, > > Thanks for your hard work on this. > > One thing I noticed is that in 6.7 there's the phrase "dismissal > from the conference". However, this is not mentioned beforehand and > even though I am sure people can imagine what this

Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC

Dear Laura, Thanks for your hard work on this. One thing I noticed is that in 6.7 there's the phrase "dismissal from the conference". However, this is not mentioned beforehand and even though I am sure people can imagine what this means, it does seem a bit "out of the blue". Maybe just to me…

Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC

Hello Cate Thanks for dedicate time to this. I'm attaching a third proposal that supersedes my former proposal. And a diff respect to my former proposal. Below I explain the changes, based in your comments. El 15/05/17 a las 10:23, Giacomo Catenazzi escribió: > Hello, > On 05.05.2017 13:46,

Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC

Hello, On 05.05.2017 13:46, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Hi everybody (...) > I'm attaching 3 documents: > > The current code of conduct (debconf_coc_current.txt) > The proposal that is on the table (debconf_coc_proposal2.txt) > A second proposal that I put on the table (debconf_coc_proposal2.txt)