On 15/08/12 19:54, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
We cannot engineering all possibilities, and we are Debian / DebConf, so
no committee. but doers! If you want to continue with your idea, go
asking informally people, give us something like:
- the OpenCowGroup: a group of 12 people and 2 cows
On 18/09/12 14:36, Michele Cane wrote:
The discussion about the contract suggests it is not 200, more like 235
bed average now: so the `risk' factor is higher
Let's stop talking about average number of people in Le Camp.
To have the full access at Le Camp we have to pay 4880 CHF per
Hi,
I have not followed this logish thread fully but here are some thoughts:
- 325 beds is a limiting factor but we always have to live with
limits. I would not use this as an argument against 'Le Camp'
which sounds like a pretty attractive venue to me in general.
There should be ways
Hi there!
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:01:20 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:37:45PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
But the issue of attendance during the DebCamp week has very real
financial implications -
c) after DebConf: will bandwidth still be available for another 1-2
weeks? Will there be billing issues?
I don't think Le Camp will be available after DebConf. And I think we
should only think about DebCamp parallel events.
Topping up numbers for the DebCamp week is the highest priority
Le mercredi, 15 août 2012 18.13:29, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
Given the limited (326) beds, my feeling is we should aim for groups
that won't stay during DebConf itself.
For the same reason, given the expressed concerns about 325 being not enough,
I'm quite convinced we'll reach the average of
On 08/15/2012 06:13 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
c) after DebConf: will bandwidth still be available for another 1-2
weeks? Will there be billing issues?
I don't think Le Camp will be available after DebConf. And I think we
should only think about DebCamp parallel events.
Topping up
