Hi Brian and Martin, and team,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 02:27:06PM +, Martín Ferrari wrote:
On 25/02/15 14:53, Brian Gupta wrote:
[...]
P.S. - I am little frustrated that it seems from the overall trend in
the conversation, that the choices of those that choose to include
meat in
also sprach Brian Gupta brian.gu...@brandorr.com [2015-02-25 15:53 +0100]:
Since Debian is a culturally diverse organization, it would be
impossible to cater this to individual omnivores, so I would
argue, that we should aim for local norms.
Yes, that is what we'll be doing: the youth hostel
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi c...@debian.org [2015-02-25 09:52 +0100]:
No. Having no default is not acceptable for registration people.
It cause us to send many many mails to remember people to set
something sensible.
As others have pointed out: unless a choice is made, the
El 25/02/15 a las 09:52, Giacomo Catenazzi escribió:
On 25.02.2015 07:53, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón santi...@debian.org [2015-02-24 23:41
+0100]:
santiago what about not having a default about food? the diet field
could be mandatory, with an empty option
Giacomo Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes:
On 25.02.2015 07:53, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón santi...@debian.org [2015-02-24 23:41
+0100]:
santiago what about not having a default about food? the diet field
could be mandatory, with an empty option by default
...
On 25.02.2015 07:53, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón santi...@debian.org [2015-02-24 23:41
+0100]:
santiago what about not having a default about food? the diet field
could be mandatory, with an empty option by default
...
santiago a real *-tagged field
I think
On Tue 2015-02-24 15:06:57 -0500, Margarita Manterola wrote:
I agree with what has already been posted that None is a very bad
idea that it doesn't really convey the meaning. It should be explicit,
i.e. Ovo-lacto vegetarian, no None or similar in the string. Please,
whatever is decided, let's
also sprach Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net [2015-02-24 22:36
+0100]:
The concern that i raised at the start of this discussion is that
this array of answers basically encourages people to appear to
demand meat and fish, even if they don't particularly want or
desire meat or fish
also sprach Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au [2015-02-23 03:25 +0100]:
given there's a meat+fish option, I'd probably read Food
preferences: None as Don't give me any food, I'll go elsewhere;
or maybe I'll eat anything and expect it to be the same as the
same as the meat+fish option. If it
Hi
I'm just reading this to pick up for DC16... It may be helpful to think,
what do you REALLY want to know, and could you ask that?
How about a tick box, would you mind/agree to eat vegetarian meals (no
meat/fish - you choose the words here) for the official/provided conference
meals?
If not,
also sprach Patty Langasek harmo...@dodds.net [2015-02-22 23:39 +0100]:
I have ... difficult ... food allergies that I contend with, and
I find that vegetarian dishes by and large conflict with my
restricted diet consistently (onions, mushrooms and garbanzo
beans).
Dear Patty,
it is my
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hartmann
richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
* other: text field
Make that allergies. We do want to accommodate Patty. We do not want
to accommodate the cookie monster or LCA's bacon man.
Richard
___
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:11 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debconf.org wrote:
Food preferences:
None
I like to eat meat and fish
No animal products for me (vegan, strict vegetarian)
Other / allergies (contact organisers)
After some more thought, I think this phrasing would
On 21.02.2015 16:11, martin f krafft wrote:
At the same time, I think we could try to avoid speaking about
vegetarians and vegans as restricted, which has a bit of a
negative connotation, or so I've been told numerous times now.
Why? It is a restriction of food choice. All of us have food
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:06:18AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com [2015-02-21 22:38
+0100]:
None
That means whatever the YH wants to cook, meat or not?
This is why I think we should add prose and explain that the
baseline by
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:06:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
While I think there are some (sport club) restaurants nearby,
I would not count on them being open, especially not during the day.
So: yes, it's mostly the youth hostel, which is why we've been
working hard with them to ensure a
also sprach Patty Langasek harmo...@dodds.net [2015-02-22 19:44 +0100]:
Remembering back to the bid, it seems that the youth hostel was
somewhat isolated from other places. Does this mean that food
options are going to be limited to the youth hostel then (similar
to DC13), or will we be able
On 22 February 2015 at 01:11, martin f krafft madd...@debconf.org wrote:
How about making the choices be:
Food preferences:
None
I like to eat meat and fish
No animal products for me (vegan, strict vegetarian)
Other / allergies (contact organisers)
FWIW, given there's a
also sprach Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com [2015-02-21 22:38
+0100]:
None
That means whatever the YH wants to cook, meat or not?
This is why I think we should add prose and explain that the
baseline by the youth hostel will be vegetarian.
I like to eat meat and
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@debconf.org [2015-02-07 13:44 +0100]:
I think we need to address it as proposed by Gaudenz: we should
really discuss the issues with the cooks and find with them a good
solution, possibly starting with Micah solution.
We are going to meet with them this
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:11 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debconf.org wrote:
None
That means whatever the YH wants to cook, meat or not?
I like to eat meat and fish
That means every day? Or is that a control variable for the above?
Richard
On 07 Feb 2015, at 05:36, Tassia Camoes Araujo tas...@acaia.ca wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:13:00PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
So, yes, I think the framing problem is important here, but the real
problem is that the negotiations with food providers should be
approached from a
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi c...@cateee.net [2015-02-07 10:28 +0100]:
I think we need to address it as proposed by Gaudenz: we should
really discuss the issues with the cooks and find with them a good
solution, possibly starting with Micah solution.
We are going to meet with them this week
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:13:00PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
So, yes, I think the framing problem is important here, but the real
problem is that the negotiations with food providers should be
approached from a different perspective. Asking them to provide gluten
friendly, ovo-lacto
Martín Ferrari tin...@tincho.org writes:
On 05/02/15 18:49, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I think this is right(er), although still pointless IMO. I do not
believe (most) people expect to eat meat at every meal. I think it
would be easier to agree with our caterer to provide meat for
approximately
On Fri 2015-02-06 04:21:15 -0500, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I think this is the right approach to the problem Daniel (dkg) was
worried about in his reply. Finding the right proportion of vegetarian
food will be an iterative process. I suggest to start with a proportion
of vegetarian which seems
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
On 04/02/15 22:59, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Could frame this differently? The normal framing (above) often ends up
with an assumption that everyone must eat meat, with only a limited
set-aside for vegetarians. This results in overconsumption
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
skip meat one day, I really don't agree with your
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
Daniel Kahn Gillmor dijo [Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:25:37AM -0500]:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
skip meat one day, I really don't agree with your proposal.
Can you think of a better
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
Hi everybody
El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió:
I would change the perspective: tell cooks the things they can add to
the menu.
What about this proposal?
Diet:
- Not applicable
- Vegan
Hi everybody
El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió:
So i'm amending my earlier proposal to this:
Dietary restrictions:
- Not applicable
- No dietary restrictions Default
- Lacto-Ovo Vegetarian (dairy and eggs OK)
- Vegan (strict vegetarian)
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
On 05/02/15 18:49, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I think this is right(er), although still pointless IMO. I do not
believe (most) people expect to eat meat at every meal. I think it
would be easier to agree with our caterer to provide meat for
approximately half of the days. I don't think it'd be seen
On Thu 2015-02-05 13:47:14 -0500, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I fail to see why you think that the current proposed wording of no
dietary restrictions implies that every meal will have meat.
I think this because i've seen it happen very often.
Many conference meals i've been at include explicit
35 matches
Mail list logo
