Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Montag, 28. Januar 2013, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
* People should be able to select their room mates.
IMO this is wrong/impractial: it would be nice to have if people are
able to
select their room mates. And we try to. But its not a should or
On Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Could you elaborate?
no. [...]
of course I _could_, but I'm not gonna work in a dysfunctional team. Life's
too short to waste it.
___
On 31.01.2013 13:46, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Montag, 28. Januar 2013, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
* People should be able to select their room mates.
IMO this is wrong/impractial: it would be nice to have if people are
able to
select their room
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Montag, 28. Januar 2013, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
* People should be able to select their room mates.
IMO this is wrong/impractial: it would be nice to have if people are
able to
select their room mates.
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
On Montag, 28. Januar 2013, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
* People should be able to select their room mates.
IMO this is wrong/impractial: it would be nice to have if people are able to
select their room mates. And we try to. But its not a should or
Hi
We discussed the Online booking vs. manual room assignment question
yesterday during our meeting. We tried to look at it from a different
angle and to define what we have to guarantee from the participants
point of view and how this can be achieved with or without an online
booking system.
*
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:35:05PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Has anyone that's been responsible for doing the room allocation bit of
debconf actually contributed any views to any of these threads yet?
That would be good - but also remember that every DebConf is different.
This one has a
Leandro Gómez leo.tel...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
On 23/01/13 18:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
Philipp Hug deb...@hug.cx wrote:
choosing
On 01/23/2013 08:54 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
The only risk is that people have to accept that if they don't organise
themselves into a group for a room, they will be allocated to any
available bed at random on arrival - but thanks to the stock-level
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.orgwrote:
Leandro Gómez leo.tel...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
On 23/01/13 18:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Daniel
On 01/24/2013 07:31 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Leandro Gómez leo.tel...@gmail.com writes:
As someone who was involved with the room allocation for dc12 I have to
agree with cate. Manual allocation is not perfect, but it'll do a better
job than implementing a room registration system, even if
On Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2013, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
So I think that manual allocation will do a better (and fairer) job.
[...]
To conclude: I don't think automatic means more fair.
fully agreed.
choosing rooms by algorithm only is a sure recipe for desaster.
Le mercredi, 23 janvier 2013 11.47:59, Giacomo Catenazzi a écrit :
On 23.01.2013 09:01, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
After looking at all those, I think we should try to adapt hoteldruid to
our needs; the fact that it is already in Debian is certainly a plus
(even if we might need to fork it
choosing rooms by algorithm only is a sure recipe for desaster.
I don't think we should automatically assign rooms.
It's better if we let the attendees choose their own room according to
availability.
But I'm against doing it manually, because:
* It's a lot of work to track all the room
Philipp Hug deb...@hug.cx wrote:
choosing rooms by algorithm only is a sure recipe for desaster.
I don't think we should automatically assign rooms.
It's better if we let the attendees choose their own room according to
availability.
Can we come up with some solution where people pay and
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
Philipp Hug deb...@hug.cx wrote:
choosing rooms by algorithm only is a sure recipe for desaster.
I don't think we should automatically assign rooms.
It's better if we let the attendees choose their own room according to
availability.
Can we come
On 23/01/13 18:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
Philipp Hug deb...@hug.cx wrote:
choosing rooms by algorithm only is a sure recipe for desaster.
I don't think we should automatically assign rooms.
It's better if we let the attendees choose their own
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
On 23/01/13 18:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
Philipp Hug deb...@hug.cx wrote:
choosing rooms by algorithm only is a sure recipe for desaster.
I don't think we should automatically assign rooms.
It's
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
Hi,
On Montag, 21. Januar 2013, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
in the context of using an online rooms booking system, here's the result
of my investigation:
In Debian:
- hoteldruid
http://www.hoteldruid.com/
[...]
After looking at all
Hi Holger,
Le mardi, 22 janvier 2013 01.04:03, Holger Levsen a écrit :
having proper software for talk selection seems way more useful to me.
I think these are not mutually exclusive.
+conference mgmt too.
Making sure we provide hosting in a fair manner is a way to manage the
conference to
20 matches
Mail list logo
