Tássia Camões dijo [Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:49:32PM -0300]:
2011/4/15 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
s/Abstract/Short Abstract (for use in schedule)/
s/Description/Full Abstract (for talk team evaluation and proceedings)/
Don't you think 'short' and 'full' abstract are a bit
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:51:18PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
Now I'm not so sure if this is correct, but let me know what you want
to do and I can update instructions.
As I said in my last mail: Something like:
s/Abstract/Short Abstract (for use in schedule)/
s/Description/Full Abstract
2011/4/15 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
s/Abstract/Short Abstract (for use in schedule)/
s/Description/Full Abstract (for talk team evaluation and proceedings)/
Don't you think 'short' and 'full' abstract are a bit confusing?
What about this:
Event title
Short description (one sentence
Some notes after browsing penta...
2011/4/15 Tássia Camões tas...@gmail.com:
Event title
Short description (one sentence long, for schedule and report)
I'd suggest adding 'one-sentence description', for printing purposes,
just after 'sub-title'.
Additional notes (for orga team)
Should it
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:02:39PM -0300, Tássia Camões wrote:
Some notes after browsing penta...
2011/4/15 Tássia Camões tas...@gmail.com:
Event title
Short description (one sentence long, for schedule and report)
I'd suggest adding 'one-sentence description', for printing purposes,
Hi,
as every year the event submission form contains three sections:
Submission notes / Abstract / Description
I always wonder what the difference might be. For me the field
Abstract is clear. It should be mandatory. There might be some use
for Submission notes which can be filled with
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:59:15PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
as every year the event submission form contains three sections:
Submission notes / Abstract / Description
I always wonder what the difference might be. For me the field
Abstract is clear. It should be mandatory.
