Re: [Debconf-team] Why a new DebConf delegation won't help

On 12/11/15 at 08:47 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Allison Randal [2015-10-21 09:16 +1300]: > > I'm good with that description from 2011. No idea how we ended up > > where we are today from that point, it was so sane and sensible. > > IIRC: The 2011 delegation

Re: [Debconf-team] Why a new DebConf delegation won't help

also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-11-12 23:28 +1300]: > I find worrying that you (and your proposal) (it's not "my proposal.") > ask trust from Debian, but without trusting Debian. I don't know how you got this impression. I like the proposal because it does away with yet a

Re: [Debconf-team] Why a new DebConf delegation won't help

On 11.11.2015 20:47, martin f krafft wrote: > Since then, we've seen a spectrum of problems, from the team unable > to make decision constantly deferring to the chairs and burning them > out, to there being a divide between chairs and some of the team, > bringing focus to the powers attributed

[Debconf-team] Why a new DebConf delegation won't help

also sprach Allison Randal [2015-10-21 09:16 +1300]: > I'm good with that description from 2011. No idea how we ended up > where we are today from that point, it was so sane and sensible. IIRC: The 2011 delegation stems from efforts to help make DebConf recognised as an