Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:06:51PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 22/10/12 20:45, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
My issue with a registration fee is on principle. We organize a
DebConf because it gives value to Debian. Important work is done
there. Most attendees do pay a sensible cost to be
On 23/10/12 10:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:06:51PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 22/10/12 20:45, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
My issue with a registration fee is on principle. We organize a
DebConf because it gives value to Debian. Important work is done
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:38PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
However, there is some benefit to advertising such a fee, and then
`sponsoring' individuals by waiving the fee for them.
The main benefit is that DebConf can ask people to `find their own
sponsor' before asking DebConf to
I understand that there is not widespread support for the registration
fee concept at face value
However, there is some benefit to advertising such a fee, and then
`sponsoring' individuals by waiving the fee for them.
The main benefit is that DebConf can ask people to `find their own
sponsor'
Daniel Pocock dijo [Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:38PM +0200]:
I understand that there is not widespread support for the registration
fee concept at face value
(...)
The main benefit is that DebConf can ask people to `find their own
sponsor' before asking DebConf to `sponsor' them.
(...)
Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/10/12 20:45, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock dijo [Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:39:38PM +0200]:
I understand that there is not widespread support for the
registration fee concept at face value (...) The main benefit is
that DebConf can ask
These discussions have been on IRC again and appear to be circular
dependencies
These appear to be the key facts:
- Le Camp contract: 160k CHF, with 60k to be paid by non-refundable
installments well in advance, and if we don't come up with the other
100k by July, no DC13
- DC12 had less than
