On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 04:52:32PM +, Moray Allan wrote:
> As I understand it, the original reason for not having the sponsor
> pack publicly linked was different: it was thought useful to be able
> to know who had requested copies, and therefore who to keep in contact
> with about sponsorship.
Hi,
On Freitag, 31. Dezember 2010, Moray Allan wrote:
> As I understand it, the original reason for not having the sponsor
> pack publicly linked was different: it was thought useful to be able
> to know who had requested copies, and therefore who to keep in contact
> with about sponsorship.
to k
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I concur with this. Debian is an open and transparent project and so is
> DebConf. (And while there are a few exceptions, financial flows are not among
> them.)
As I understand it, the original reason for not having the sponsor
pack publicly
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2010, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> For DC10 we tried different variations (adding / removing a page) for
> different potential sponsors. That's why it wasn't linked and by now I
> believe it wasn't a very good idea, so just having one might be the
> way to go.
I concur with
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> I think the idea was that we should be able to follow up by knowing
> who all had a copy. However, that was Pablo's and the sponsorship
> team's domain, so all of those people can let you know what they have
> learned over the years.
For DC
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:17:48AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> I'd just like to remind everyone reading this that fundraising isn't
> just dumped on "DebConf 11 people" - anyone can help here. Zack, would
> you like to join the DebConf fundraising team?
I've been floating around #debconf-sponsor
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot! I'll pass over the brochure, specifying that it's the old
> one, but that it can give an idea of the thresholds. In the meantime, it
> would be nice if the DebConf11 people can start thinking at who'll be
> the main cont
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:41:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Thanks a lot! I'll pass over the brochure, specifying that it's the old
> one, but that it can give an idea of the thresholds. In the meantime, it
> would be nice if the DebConf11 people can start thinking at who'll be
> the mai
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 06:08:33PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Heya,
> having attended some kind of "corporate" FOSS events as of lately,
> I've already got asked by a handful of big companies information about
> DebConf11 sponsoring. I understand it's early wrt the conference dates,
> bu
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:58:07PM -0400, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> SPI can handle US sponsors but for sponsors outside of the US it makes
> more sense to direct sponsorship funds to ffis.
ACK.
> > Also, can you please point me (once more!) to the sponsorship brochure
> > of last year? Any re
I create a proposal banners "Support Debian Conference 2011, Be a
Sponsor!", see:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf11/Artwork
suggestion, link banner to brochure or a page with updated information
on how to sponsor the next debconf11.
proposal: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/NewSponsor
.Vales
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Heya,
> having attended some kind of "corporate" FOSS events as of lately,
> I've already got asked by a handful of big companies information about
> DebConf11 sponsoring. I understand it's early wrt the conference dates,
> but I'd rather think that "it's never to ear
Heya,
having attended some kind of "corporate" FOSS events as of lately,
I've already got asked by a handful of big companies information about
DebConf11 sponsoring. I understand it's early wrt the conference dates,
but I'd rather think that "it's never to early" to secure DebConf
sponsoring.
S
13 matches
Mail list logo
