Hi Holger,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
so, you can flame now.
On the contrary: Many thanks for your detailed report and the insight
you gave. This draws a very better picture than past discussions here
on the list. Many thanks for this! Considering you also
On 2012-10-29 08:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
Considering you also visited one
proposed alternative (Interlaken) I would like to trust you and the
voting (from first part) that Le Camp might make a nice DebConf.
The problem is not to answer What is nicer? but to be sure that we
choose something
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:10:37PM +, Moray Allan wrote:
Only if it is shown that both options would work equally well for
Debian in budget/risks/etc. is it relevant to ask which is nicer.
I have choosen the term nice more or less as a sign of optimism in
contrast of some very sad
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
The problem is anyway not to answer Le Camp vs. Interlaken. It has
not yet been shown that either of these options will work with
acceptable risks,
IMO it has for Le Camp.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
On 29/10/12 14:10, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
The problem is anyway not to answer Le Camp vs. Interlaken. It has
not yet been shown that either of these options will work with
acceptable risks,
IMO it has for Le Camp.
There seem to be a lot of
