Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) dijo [Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:32:28AM +0200]: > I also don't see the need to battle them out. We have a few people > strongly in favour of wafer and no one against it (at least as far as I > could track). martin has brought up Odoo before, but has said that he's >

Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

On 06/10/2015 20:43, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) dijo [Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:32:28AM +0200]: I also don't see the need to battle them out. We have a few people strongly in favour of wafer and no one against it (at least as far as I could track). martin has brought up Odoo

Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

Hi! On 05/10/2015 07:28, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: >> * Then I put the advantages and disadvantages for each 'contender'. >> The way this is written feels very battle-like, which is not (really) >> intended. If you have another way of summarising this, please go ahead >> (a table in a wiki?)

[Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

Hi all PyConZA is over which means it's website time. I don't think we'll find a time for everyone to attend the meeting, so we need to be clear on the meeting objectives and make this as cooperative as possible. Bear this in mind and put your thoughts in the titanpad [1] accordingly so that

Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

also sprach Bernelle Verster [2015-10-04 20:54 +0200]: > Said another way, if we do the *amazing*, and wafer is the way to > go, are we confident that it will carry us all the way through, or > do we still need to see it's stuff by the deadline to find out > what else needs

Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

also sprach Bernelle Verster [2015-10-04 19:49 +0200]: > Decide on which system(s) are being developed as contenders for the > DC16 website. (If we feel we can decide to only go with wafer, that > would be *amazing*) I would be happy if wafer was the system we need and which

Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:28 PM, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Bernelle Verster [2015-10-04 19:49 +0200]: >> Decide on which system(s) are being developed as contenders for the >> DC16 website. (If we feel we can decide to only go with wafer, that

Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.

On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:49:06PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > Hi all > May I suggest Wednesday 18:00 UTC just because I see no other > alternative. Please feel free to suggest another day/time. > > * Can we get an idea for what is in the running, and who is driving it? > Systems intended to