Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jérémy Bobbio, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 17:14:34 +0200, a écrit : > This would make this option appear in all images, even those where > speakup is not available, wouldn't it? > > f8.txt should probably be amended in f8.txt.withgtk… Right, here is an updated patch Samuel Index: build/boot/x86/f8.txt.

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 04:06:57PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Index: build/boot/x86/f8.txt > === > --- build/boot/x86/f8.txt (révision 55726) > +++ build/boot/x86/f8.txt (copie de travail) > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > Force stat

Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1

2008-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
I forgot to forward the mail below. It would be probably useful to work with them for accessibility support of that live CD. Daniel Baumann, le Wed 27 Aug 2008 14:58:35 +0200, a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Debian Live Lenny Beta1 > === > > T

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 13:59:22 +0200, a écrit : > > So we could commit this for now? > > You should add amd64 as well. Ah, right. Samuel Index: build/boot/x86/f8.txt === --- build/boot/x86/f8.txt (révision 55726) +++

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Wed, Sep 10, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Frans Pop, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 11:38:21 +0200, a ?crit : > > I would suggest to only add speakup to the graphical installer images. > > That would be better than nothing, as that includes the complete network > installer (not the businesscard). > > > I wou

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Frans Pop, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 11:38:21 +0200, a écrit : > > I would suggest to only add speakup to the graphical installer > > images. Those are big already and already have a higher memory > > requirement. An extra increase there is a lot le

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 11:38:21 +0200, a écrit : > I would suggest to only add speakup to the graphical installer images. > Those are big already and already have a higher memory requirement. An > extra increase there is a lot less harmful than for the "regular" images. > > I would also s

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > That's the mini.iso for i386. Somehow we have grown by 2MB, over 35%! > We really should do an analysis of exactly where this increase comes > from. The increase of the netboot images is actually fairly easy to explain. Uncompressed the initrd in

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 11:38:21 +0200, a écrit : > I would suggest to only add speakup to the graphical installer images. That would be better than nothing, as that includes the complete network installer (not the businesscard). > I would also seriously suggest to limit speakup to x86 and

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: > The script part is integrated, what is left is just to add the kernel > modules to the initrd, the question was "which archs and which > targets?" For instance, the patch below adds it to x86 cdrom, hd-media > and netboot targets. I am oppos

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Christian Perrier, le Wed 10 Sep 2008 06:39:41 +0200, a écrit : > I'm personnally not completely sure about the status of this work, so > I prefer leaving others to answer. The script part is integrated, what is left is just to add the kernel modules to the initrd, the question was "which

Re: speakup enabled d-i?

2008-09-10 Thread Christian Perrier
Contributors from the debian-accessibility group may be able to complete my answer Original mail to -boot: Quoting Terry D. Cudney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hello, > > I'm new to this list, so please bear with me. > > I have been using debian for several years now, with speakup (a