Re: systemd and accessible vt's

2014-10-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100: Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt in userspace. In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose a great, stable environment.

Re: systemd and accessible vt's

2014-10-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 30 Oct 2014 21:00:26 +0100, a écrit : Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100: It should now the time to figure out: * how early boot messages should be read Sorry, I misquoted: Sebastian Humenda wrote it. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

systemd and accessible vt's

2013-12-03 Thread Halim Sahin
Hi all, Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt in userspace. In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose a great, stable environment. Afaik sbl and brltty depend on /dev/vcs*

Re: systemd and accessible vt's

2013-12-03 Thread Sebastian Humenda
Hello Halim, Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100: Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt in userspace. In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose a great, stable

Re: systemd and accessible vt's

2013-12-03 Thread Halim Sahin
Hi, On Di, Dez 03, 2013 at 06:59:13 +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote: Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100: Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt in userspace. In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. If someone tries to remove vt support