Hello,
For the past two weeks I have been trying to port openafs to the
alpha. I've had mostly decent success (through experience -- at IBM I was
porting it to i386-Linux before the source was commonly available). So now
the server processes, the kernel module and afsd compile and run, but
T. Weyergraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just a question: Do the boot-floppies on alpha have a maintainer ?
> IIRC, they didn't, but Ron Farrer took a look at it.
Ron Farrer was the only one who showed interest when I offered it up for
adoption. His email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Debia
Hi,
just a question: Do the boot-floppies on alpha have a maintainer ?
IIRC, they didn't, but Ron Farrer took a look at it.
Just curious...
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Weyergraf[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
My Favorite IA64 Opcode-guess ( see arch/ia64/lib
> > > Does this mean we can also get all the not-yet-in-alpha KDE stuff
> > > working? I'll have a go...
> >
> > Already tried...still problematic. Same with mozilla. At least Qt works
> > somewhat :-)
>
> I'm using a g++ wrapper at the moment that re-execs g++ with s/-O2/-O0/
> done on the ar
On Fri 02 Mar 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> > Does this mean we can also get all the not-yet-in-alpha KDE stuff
> > working? I'll have a go...
>
> Already tried...still problematic. Same with mozilla. At least Qt works
> somewhat :-)
I'm u
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Cool!
>
> Does this mean we can also get all the not-yet-in-alpha KDE stuff
> working? I'll have a go...
Already tried...still problematic. Same with mozilla. At least Qt works
somewhat :-)
C
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Paul Slootman wrote:
> I saw that there was 1:2.95.3-6 in the archive for the other arches,
> did you miss that or is there a reason you're sticking to -5 for the
> NMU?
-6 doesn't build (dies before stage1). I still haven't looked to see what
changed to cause that, but ther
On Thu 01 Mar 2001, George A. Dowding wrote:
>
> Not to important, but pgperl which uses pgplot seg faults when trying
> to generate GIF's. It works fine with postscript. Also it works ok
> on i86
Ugh, I hate this sort of problem...
How about PNG output?
Paul Slootman
--
home: [EMAIL P
On Thu 01 Mar 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> Well, I removed the mi-thunk patch that had earlier been useful and
> voila! Qt now works perfectly when compiled by gcc 2.95.3-5.0.1 (in
> incoming now). I just uploaded the libs generated by qt-x11 and also
> qtcups, so get them while they'
On Thu 01 Mar 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> > Ok, great. I think the problem is directly caused by the C++ breaking in
> > gcc. I'm going to have another go at at least fixing it well enough to
> > handle small stuff like this (handling Qt is another story altogether).
>
> Ok, found
10 matches
Mail list logo