On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:02:31PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > There are three basic demands
> > for machines of a given architecture:
> >
> > * Autobuilding. As a maintainer, I can safely say that alpha
> > binaries for my packages are autobuilt very promptly after sour
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer wrote:
> This is not the first time that potential donors have gone without a
> dialog. I think Mr. Hilarius hits the nail on the head; Debian does not
> appear to have a person actually in charge of managing incoming
> equipment donation pro
[SPI Treasurer hat *OFF*]
> Yes, I got a copy as well, but thanks for including it. I think Brandon
> recommend that Brandon receive the machine, especially since it seems that
> as I used to be able to when I was employed to work on Alphas (Brandon is
> they say, since Brandon sent his messag
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> But a lot of activities don't have a single point of contact. Is that a
> problem? Sometimes. It might be nice to have single contacts for, say,
> each port, but I don't think there is one. "Write to the list" has been
> sufficient.
There alr
Hello Maurice (and others),
Maurice Hilarius wrote:
Just for interest, I asked the Debian maintainers, through the
recommended page, and through the Debian alpha list, where we should
send/communicate with to donate a machine.
So far we have no response.
This is an example of what I perceive as
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Maurice Hilarius wrote:
> Just for interest, I asked the Debian maintainers, through the recommended
> page, and through the Debian alpha list, where we should send/communicate
> with to donate a machine.
>
> So far we have no response.
Not surprising, although probably n
With regards to your message at 10:32 AM 4/26/02, Branden Robinson / SPI
Treasurer. Where you stated:
Bdale,
This gentleman makes a good point.
Thanks! I was hoping this would be taken the wrong way.
Many times this type of thing is occuring.
A few months ago a call went out for testing some relea
Bdale,
This gentleman makes a good point.
Several days ago, this person and another (apparently independent) party
mailed me in my capacity as SPI Treasurer with offers of equipment
donations.
As SPI Treasurer, I am not empowered to accept or refuse donations on
behalf of Debian. SPI manages th
Just for interest, I asked the Debian maintainers, through the recommended
page, and through the Debian alpha list, where we should send/communicate
with to donate a machine.
So far we have no response.
This is an example of what I perceive as the biggest issues with Debian (
and Alpha) at pres
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Jurriaan on Alpha wrote:
> I'm running into some gdb problems with linux 2.5.10:
>
> ALPHA :gdb ./angband
> GNU gdb 5.1.1
> Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and
On Fri 26 Apr 2002, Jurriaan on Alpha wrote:
> so I wanted to recompile gdb.
> apt-get source gdb
> cd gdb-5.1.1
> fakeroot debian/rules binary
>
> and after a lot of messages, the compilation won't proceed because
> makeinfo isn't installed.
>
> apt-cache search makeinfo points at texi2html as
I'm running into some gdb problems with linux 2.5.10:
ALPHA :gdb ./angband
GNU gdb 5.1.1
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "sh
12 matches
Mail list logo
