Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Ionut Georgescu
see http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/unix/ccc.html for my experience on using alien on the compaq .rpm's. It is tricky, especially if you use gcc 3.x, but it works. And you get your .deb. Regards, Ionut On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:04:55PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Phil Carmody
--- Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ccc is complaining that > > <<< > > ./compile speed.c > > cc: Error: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h, line 71: Invalid declarator. > > (declarator) > > __pthread_cond_align_t __align; > > -^ > > >>> > > > > Which is being

Re: [tulip] tulip and alpha error kernel 2.4.22

2003-12-04 Thread Donald Becker
On 27 Nov 2003, Martin Arrieta wrote: > i have one alpha lx164 with debian (woody) and kernel 2.4.22. > > #uname -a > Linux alpha 2.4.22 #7 Thu Nov 27 07:13:47 UYT 2003 alpha unknown .. > 00:05.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21140 > [FasterNet] (rev 22) > Subsy

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Phil Carmody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh > > file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing. > > Yup, I tried that hack myself! It kinda-sorta seemed to work.

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Phil Carmody wrote: > John - would the 'gcc' rather than 'gcc-2.95' hack fix this? Should I > uninstall > the current installation and reinstall again? Unknown. It worked for me. I'm only about 3 days older at ccc than you are :-) -- John

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Juraj Holtak
On Thursday 04 December 2003 19:54, Phil Carmody wrote: > <<< > ./compile speed.c > cc: Error: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h, line 71: Invalid declarator. > (declarator) > __pthread_cond_align_t __align; > -^ > nope never seen that :-// > = > When inserting a CD,

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Juraj Holtak wrote: > its time for: > rpm -ivh --no-deps ccc_blabla > rpm -ivh --no-deps cpml_blabla Well, you should at least use alien. -- John

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Phil Carmody
--- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh > file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing. Yup, I tried that hack myself! It kinda-sorta seemed to work. > Also, I hacked it to call gcc instead of gcc-2.9

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Juraj Holtak
grab the rpms shit on the debian way of installing its time for: rpm -ivh --no-deps ccc_blabla rpm -ivh --no-deps cpml_blabla it works under stable dunno about testing but hey! who wants to run testing software on alpha???... :-) cheers, juraj On Thursday 04 December 2003 19:44, John Goerze

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread John Goerzen
I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing. Also, I hacked it to call gcc instead of gcc-2.95. You may need to make a few other minor adjustments to GCC_PATH. -- John On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:01:01AM

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Phil Carmody
OK, I grabbed the latest rpms, and have a key. I noticed that the cxx rpm's version number is higher than the one in the .deb, so decied to not try installing cxx, and just restrict myself to ccc. However, when it comes to me and ccc, it was the same old same old: <<< Setting up ccc (6.5.9.001-1)

Re: CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Juraj Holtak
Hi Phil! http://h30097.www3.hp.com/linux/compaq_c/ is what u want! good hunt! Cheers, Juraj PS: i compiled with the beta version of ccc so it`s safe i think On Thursday 04 December 2003 17:12, Phil Carmody wrote: > It's probably time for my yearly attempt to install the Compaq C compiler, > an

Re: PCI Video Card?

2003-12-04 Thread Jay Estabrook
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:44:59PM -, Peter Watkinson wrote: > > Is there any chance with a radeon 8500 agp? You mean in one of the API UP1x00 boxes? I'm not sure if it'll ever work in the older (UP1000 or UP1100) ones, but I think I've heard reports of success in the UP1500, which appears to

CCC/CXX installation

2003-12-04 Thread Phil Carmody
It's probably time for my yearly attempt to install the Compaq C compiler, and I'me hitting trouble before I even start (however, I'm not phased, it's never worked i the past, and I'm desensitized now). I notice that I have the following files (downloaded from a previous attempt) ccc-6.5.9.001-6.

Re: PCI Video Card?

2003-12-04 Thread Peter Watkinson
Hi Jay, Is there any chance with a radeon 8500 agp? I have one in another computer. I tried it much earlier in the year with no success. I bought it from the Crucial memory people. Kind regards, Peter Watkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Jay Estabrook" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Installation problem on Miata PWS 500a

2003-12-04 Thread Gianluca Bonetti
Giovanni Scudeller wrote: ok. the problem is : - - dont't install ? - - dont't boot ? - -- - Hello :) Very cryptical... For my experience PWS500 doesn't give any problem for Debian installation. Actually I installed Debian Potato and always ugraded since then! :) Actually I didn't read your pr

Re: Installation problem on Miata PWS 500a

2003-12-04 Thread Giovanni Scudeller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alle 22:41, mercoledì 3 dicembre 2003, Andrea Orlando ha scritto: > Hi > > I have a Digital Personal Workstation Alpha 500a (miata) with QLogic > ISP 1020 scsi host adapter (4.3GB scsi-3 HD, 256MB ram). > > I have tried to install many times the Debi

Re: Installation problem on Miata PWS 500a

2003-12-04 Thread Roberto Bernetti
Alle 01:16, giovedì 4 dicembre 2003, Richard Fillion ha scritto: > I've installed debian on my Miata 500au without any problems. The > qlogic scsi controller is supported, don't worry. > > As for the problems you're experiencing, it's difficult to help without > knowing exactly where it's failing