On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:23:56PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> In order to complete the final bits of the GNOME 2.6 transition, we need
> to get jack-audio-connection-kit compiled on alpha.
> The latest version hasn't been tried by the buildd yet in the last two
> weeks. Can it be scheduled to
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:25:19AM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference between sarge and sid? I thought the
> current debian was woody.
sarge is the upcoming stable release.
sid is the staging ground for everything that will go into the stable
release being develope
J. Dub wrote:
> When calling interactive boot by
> boot dka0 -fl "i"
> I get the choice menu only on primary console!
>
> Any ideas?
If you don't care about having the graphical console, you could try
"set console serial" in SRM. Otherwise, I don't know.
Cameron.
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Steve!
ok, so what is the real functional difference?
-- michael
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> sarge is the upcoming stable release.
>
> sid is the staging ground for everything that will go into the stable
> release being developed at any given moment.
>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:40:00AM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Hi Steve!
>
> ok, so what is the real functional difference?
Stable (Woody at the moment): A bit dated, but very well tested and
security support available.
Testing (Sarge at the moment): Automatica
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:44:53PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> > I don't see anything new at:
>
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
>
> > will the build happen today, as in before 2400 EST?
>
> Yes; an
ok, i'm getting myself very confused and maybe some one can give me a sanity
check.
i have a number of ES40's i'm putting sarge onto. i have it installed and
working fairly well.
now i'm trying to clone the disk image for the rest of the ES40's, this is
what i'm trying:
SystemA: good install o
sorry, just wanted to resend this with a correct subject line :-|
ok, i'm getting myself very confused and maybe some one can give me a sanity
check.
i have a number of ES40's i'm putting sarge onto. i have it installed and
working fairly well.
now i'm trying to clone the disk image for the rest
well, let's say it another way,
woody=stable
sarge=testing
sid=unstable
the contents of each move towards stability... and woody is so ancient and
sarge is approaching stability.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:43 AM
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:59:23AM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> SystemA: good install of sarge onto /dev/sda, sda is 128M free space, 16G
> ext2 mounted on / , 2GB swap. to clone the disk i'm doing:
>
> init 1, swapoff -a, mount -n -o remount,ro /
> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=1024k
>
Hello Michael,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:18:53PM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Moin Helge!
>
> i get the normalish looking:
>
> 0:2/vmlinuz ro initrd=/initrd.imb root=/dev/sda2
> 1:2/vmlinuz.old initrd=/initrd.img
> 2:3/vmlinuz.net.gz ro root=/dev/sda2
> 3:3/vmlinuz ro root=/ev/sda2
> 8:- ro
Moin Helge!
maybe typos in there, the system is on serial console so i copied from my
notes ...
i normally boot 0
the interesting part is the clone disk boots fine on the original system, but
not on either of the other systems.
-- michael
Helge Kreutzmann schrieb am Freitag, den 16. Juli 2004:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:43:01AM -0400, Rob Dupcak wrote:
> Do the daily builds have Tulip driver support? (Or will they?)
Daily builds have included the tulip driver for as long as there have
been daily builds on alpha.
> Or asked another way...
> Is there an easy way of telling if a specific
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:40:00AM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Hi Steve!
> ok, so what is the real functional difference?
That depends on what's being staged at any particular moment.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >
> > sarge is
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:25PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:44:53PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> > > I don't see anything new at:
> > > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
> > >
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 01:46:15PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> Now, manually partitioning seems to be almost impossible, unless I'm
> overcomplicating it.
> Note: I have many years of Tru64 4.x and 5.x and linux manually
> partitioning of disklabels, I know the bsd and bios differences etc.
>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:25PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
>
> > I tried the netinst-Version from 15th of Juli. The problem with the broken
> > cia_core seems still to exist;
>
> Correct, no kernel-image package has been uploaded w
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:15:24PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:25PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> > > I tried the netinst-Version from 15th of Juli. The problem with the broken
> > > cia_core seems still to
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:40:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:15:24PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
>
> > Is the patch for this problem available as a diff, so I can patch the
> > kernel myself?
>
> kernel-image packages have previously been posted to the mailing list,
>
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:58:45PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I've ported libglide3 to amd64 and ia64. So now xfree86 can Build-Depend
> > on libglide3-dev on those arches.
> I've integrated this patch:
>
> $ svn log -r
20 matches
Mail list logo
