RES: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-12 Thread Geoff Martin
I've tested on my lx164 with matrox milleniun II graphic card... But is still hanging the machine... No X on my alpha... Geoff -Mensagem original- De: Ivan Jager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 4 de outubro de 2006 02:37 Para: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org Cc:

Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
Hi alpha porters, As I wrote in the bug report, I am turning around to find a fix. This bug did not appear in the previous build from the same release. It also does not appear on other architectures, because ircd-hybrid only uses epoll on alpha as rtsigio does not work there. Any help would be

Re: Kernel USB regression on XP1000

2006-10-12 Thread Simon Brown
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:15 +0100, Simon Brown wrote: I might just pull the modem as I don't really need it, unless anybody is familiar with ISAPnP? The modem was a red herring, I'd forgotten about the magic usb enable in SRM. thanks Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-12 Thread Simon Brown
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 01:36 -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: Heh, I was somehow expecting it to drop me back into a firmware prompt. After a reboot the bits seemed to still be around, so I attached the output of ser pim. This was with the G200, xorg 7.1.0-1, on the c3700. Nothing from Xorg.0.log

Re: Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: gcc -I../include -I/usr/include/pcre -Wall -O2 -g -c s_bsd_epoll.c s_bsd_epoll.c:87: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'epoll_create' s_bsd_epoll.c:87: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...'

Re: Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:55:40PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: From the looks of it, it seems like you should be able to just delete all the preprocessor stuff after the #includes in s_bsd_epoll.c and get away with it. We know that etch will release with a glibc that contains a valid epoll

Re: Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: As I wrote in the bug report, I am turning around to find a fix. FWIW, this doesn't translate well into idiomatic English. :) I think you mean that you're desperate to find a fix? This bug did not appear in the previous build

Re: Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:09:53PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: As I wrote in the bug report, I am turning around to find a fix. FWIW, this doesn't translate well into idiomatic English. :) I think you mean that you're