Tom Evans wrote:
> I'm really just shooting for the "out of box" experience with Etch on
> Alphs to be "stable".
>
> I know (and use) the newer versions of glibc - I would just rather that
> people *choose*
> to use a newer version instead of being required to get something from
> testing or u
Bob Tracy wrote:
I reported elsewhere that version 2.3.999.2-11 (glibc-2.4) seems to work
fine, and Uwe reported that libc6.1_2.5-1_alpha.deb is working also. If
for some reason people require glibc-2.3, they will have to retrieve the
sources for the stable package and apply the appropriate work
Tom Evans wrote:
> I just wanted to mention that while the "stable" glibc is still broken,
> a few people are trying to look at it - I recommend people check out the
> conversation at:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=325600
>
> I'm glad to hear that a new alphaserver is com
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:35:03PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > (2) being unable to build firefox with gcc/g++ 4.X (compiler segfault
> > during build). firefox-1.5.X and -2.0.X build fine with gxx-3.4,
> > although it takes nearly eight hours for a build to finish d
4 matches
Mail list logo
