And here we have another patch
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1abcbf6f1b5a7b91/
which one is going to experimental/unstable?
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:38:53 -0700
SL == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SL
SL On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:50:06PM -0500, Bob
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:22:00PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
And here we have another patch
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1abcbf6f1b5a7b91/
That's the same patch (and AFAICT, the same message).
which one is going to experimental/unstable?
Neither.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:22:00PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
And here we have another patch
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1abcbf6f1
b5a7b91/
That's the same patch (and AFAICT, the same message).
which one is going to experimental/unstable?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:08:54AM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:22:00PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
And here we have another patch
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/1abcbf6f1
b5a7b91/
That's the same patch (and AFAICT,
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:08:54AM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
And how will we boot 2.6.23 then???
How should I know? I asked for testing in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2007/08/msg00018.html, and apparently
nobody who's concerned about 2.6.23 yet has seen
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:01:38 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:08:54AM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
And how will we boot 2.6.23 then???
How should I know? I asked for testing in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2007/08/msg00018.html,
Previous time I tried not tested patch to aboot (not from Steve) it
end up with major breackage:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2002/12/msg00074.html
So what I am talking about? Steve, if you want somebody to test
something you should assure him/her that it should work. Why don't you
boot
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:01:38 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Huh??? I sent you the build logs: never got an ACK.
http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whoops! Thanks, Julien... I missed the post in all the dreck that
passes for signal (as opposed to
Please help me understand - no patched version will go to
experimental/unstable?
I will try to test tonight or tomorrow - is there a .deb already, or
should I build it?
I went to the link looking for a .deb - which is why I backed off -
figured someone would ask the questions that I was
Tom Evans wrote:
Please help me understand - no patched version will go to
experimental/unstable?
I will try to test tonight or tomorrow - is there a .deb already, or
should I build it?
I went to the link looking for a .deb - which is why I backed off -
figured someone would ask the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:31:45PM +0400, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
Previous time I tried not tested patch to aboot (not from Steve) it
end up with major breackage:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2002/12/msg00074.html
So what I am talking about? Steve, if you want somebody to test
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:30:56PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:36:36PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Was the issue with using aboot for net booting addressed with this patch
set? I've not had need of that functionality, but I can probably rig up a
12 matches
Mail list logo
