On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Oliver Falk wrote:
> > If you think there's a chance you might be able to take over the job,
> > I encourage you to mail libc-ports, as I don't know the answers
> > myself.
>
> As I said, since I don't know what skills one must have, I'm not sure if I
> might be able to take o
Oliver Falk wrote:
>
> It might be wise to still support a base OS, without the X gimmicks...
>
+1 -- that would be mighty useful to me, but I'm not sure if that could
reasonably be called "debian" (or redhat for that matter)
Brian Szymanski
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@list
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:23:39PM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
Matt Turner wrote:
The State of Alpha Linux
We're all subscribed to this list because we use a dying platform.
You think it's dying? :-P
Well, at least the Debian alpha port is not likely to continue past
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:32 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
No, I don't think this is the problem at all. jcristau, the developer
who told me he didn't care, has at least one alpha.
I used to have (remote) access to an alpha. I don't anymore (other than
Debian's port machine).
4 matches
Mail list logo
