Re: kernel regression on 164UX

2010-08-03 Thread Matt Turner
(You might want to turn off HTML mail for mailing list posts.) On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Ian Las wrote: > Completed initial tests. > Last working kernel for 164Ux is 2.6.22.19 > First broken kernel is 2.6.23 > Installed Git package. > Need some help how to continue: > As linux-2.6.23 is old

Re: current state of sid (unstable)

2010-08-03 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Michael Cree wrote: >> Comments welcome.  I've received one strong recommendation to give >> Gentoo a try, > > Matt, no doubt :-/  He's a great evangelist for Gentoo. Turn that :-/ upside.. well, not down. :-\ is pretty much the same. (Yes, it was me) >> presumab

kernel regression on 164UX

2010-08-03 Thread Ian Las
Completed initial tests. Last working kernel for 164Ux is 2.6.22.19First broken kernel is 2.6.23Installed Git package.Need some help how to continue:As linux-2.6.23 is older than 2.6.22.19 would it be possible to specify 2.6.22.19 as good and 2.6.23 as bad ?It has a higher revision number but is

Re: current state of sid (unstable)

2010-08-03 Thread Michael Cree
On 4/08/2010, at 1:48 AM, Bob Tracy wrote: (1) DRI is broken again. That may've happened when much of the DRI was shifted into the kernel. (2) KMS works at the console level but breaks when X is started. But I wouldn't be too worried about that as we are in good company. KMS is reported

current state of sid (unstable)

2010-08-03 Thread Bob Tracy
Long time, no involvement :-(. A primary hard disk failure a number of months ago took the wind out of my sails, and I wasn't sure I wanted to reengage on this particular battlefield. In the final analysis, I don't have the time I once did, but in a perverse kind of way, it's kinda fun. So... W