Re: ghostscript packages for Alpha

2011-08-04 Thread Bob Tracy
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:26:13AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote: > You guys may have been able to compile certain packages on your > systems because you have an old install that is partially upgraded. Can't speak for anyone else reading this, but my "unstable" setup was current within a week (mi

Re: ghostscript packages for Alpha

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Cree
On 5/08/2011, at 2:00 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: The package backlog is here, too: The old Alpha autobuilder has not been running since start of April, and we got the new one running from debian-ports up and going middle of July. Unfortunately a lot of architecture "all" packages have come

more Alpha package updates

2011-08-04 Thread Bob Tracy
(The original subject header was getting old...) Python 2.6.7-4 built successfully. Here's the resulting package list: idle-python2.6_2.6.7-4_all.deb libpython2.6_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb python2.6_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb python2.6-dbg_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb python2.6-dev_2.6.7-4_alpha.deb python2.6-doc_2.6.7-4_a

RE: ghostscript packages for Alpha

2011-08-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
The package backlog is here, too: The following packages have been kept back: ca-certificates exim4 fontconfig-config gawk git-man libalgorithm-diff-xs-perl libatk1.0-data libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl libcompress-raw-zlib-perl libcurl3 libcurl3-gnutls li

Re: ghostscript packages for Alpha

2011-08-04 Thread Bob Tracy
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 01:05:02PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:32:11AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > > We'll see how the "ghostscript" build goes today. > > Done. I'll give it a cursory going-over this evening, i.e., try to > print something. > (...) Couldn't wait: logged-in