Hi,
(haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Alexander Wirt dixit:
Could you
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:38:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Alexander Wirt dixit:
Could you
Hallo,
I have a lettux 400 und would like to discuss with other debian people
about the lettux 400.
Best wishes
Peter Felten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all porters
should be aware of.
It's not really that mails going to debian-ports@ appear that often.
PS: Excuse my quoting style, currently on
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all
porters should be aware of.
We have debian-devel-announce for that, the
Steve McIntyre dixit:
That seems like a bad idea to me, tbh. There will be people who won't
notice that the meaning of debian-ports@ has changed, and who will try
to use it with its old meaning.
favour of the existing behaviour. If anybody does use try to use it
that way in future, the new list
6 matches
Mail list logo
