Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Bob Tracy
(This is a separate copy to the list, just to keep everyone informed. No attachment included.) On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 04:49:15PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > I don't seem to have received that message. I'll try sending again just to you... The attached "packages" file was on the order of 500k,

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Michael Cree
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 07:02:15PM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:00:59PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > > Did you build with latest toolchain? I suspect the issue has > > appeared with toolchain changes (hard to pin down when because there > > was quite a period in which a new

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Bob Tracy
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:00:59PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > Did you build with latest toolchain? I suspect the issue has > appeared with toolchain changes (hard to pin down when because there > was quite a period in which a new version of guile-2.0 was not > uploaded). > > And the bug (a segf

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Michael Cree
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:40:04AM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 07:36:11AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > > That's not going to help at the moment because vim is bd-uninstallable. > > > > The real problem is guile-2.0 and guile-2.2, both of which FTBFS, and > > are blocking the

RE: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Skye
Thanks. That answers my question ;-) I was thinking if they were on GitLab or similar one could pull intermediate builds for testing. If someone could kindly provide the link for issues for Alpha that would be most helpful. =Skye -Original Message- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [m

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Bob! On 11/25/19 1:40 PM, Bob Tracy wrote: > I downloaded the Debian source for "guile-2.0_2.0.13+1-5.3" and successfully > built the binary packages on my PWS-433au without having to modify anything. > My guess is some kind of toolchain or other build environment issue on > the "buildd" server

RE: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Skye
Are the build servers for Alpha public facing? I plan to test install on Alpha in a few day and having access to the code and environment could prove useful. =Skye -Original Message- From: Bob Tracy [mailto:r...@frus.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 5:40 AM To: Michael Cree; John P

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 11/25/19 4:41 PM, Skye wrote: > Are the build servers for Alpha public facing? I plan to test install on > Alpha in a few day and having access to the code and environment could prove > useful. What do you mean with "public facing"? They are on the internet, of course, but they are not publicl

Re: Updated installation images for Debian Ports 2019-11-22

2019-11-25 Thread Bob Tracy
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 07:36:11AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > That's not going to help at the moment because vim is bd-uninstallable. > > The real problem is guile-2.0 and guile-2.2, both of which FTBFS, and > are blocking the building of many other packages. I downloaded the Debian source for