Hi,
Am 19.06.20 um 19:19 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 6/19/20 7:12 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Sorry, I don't believe I don't need to fix stuff here myself. ia64 and
>> m68k even didn't yet do a ICU rebuild or at least make stuff being
>> rebuildable.
>>
>>> Would it be okay if I send
Am 19.06.20 um 17:46 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
>> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> :
>>> So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>>> available.
>>
>> Correct. Except stayi
On 6/19/20 7:12 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Sorry, I don't believe I don't need to fix stuff here myself. ia64 and
> m68k even didn't yet do a ICU rebuild or at least make stuff being
> rebuildable.
>
>> Would it be okay if I send a pull request to make the necessary changes?
>
> I am perfectly a
On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>> So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>> available.
>
> Correct. Except staying as close as possible with upstream.
While at the same time, th
Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>available.
Correct. Except staying as close as possible with upstream.
>>> Not sure why you want to enforce architectures off libreoffice when
>>> it’s technic
On 6/19/20 10:08 AM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 19. Juni 2020 09:58:34 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>
>> clang isn’t required to build libreoffice [1], it’s just recommend.
>
> I know. That is even documented:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libre
6 matches
Mail list logo
