On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:15:16AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 12/12/22 20:45, Michael Cree wrote:
> > Either the arch baseline is raised to something that is easier to
> > maintain (which, frankly, I think is essential if the Alpha port is to
> > survive any longer), s
Hello!
On 12/12/22 20:45, Michael Cree wrote:
Either the arch baseline is raised to something that is easier to
maintain (which, frankly, I think is essential if the Alpha port is to
survive any longer), someone else steps up to fix the brokenness that
arises from non-atomic multi-cpu-instructio
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:24:06PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On Dec 12, 2022, at 7:17 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:24:59PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I a
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 7:17 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:24:59PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>
>>
On Dec 12, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
>>>
>>> I am not interested in supporting old Alphas without BWX anymore.
>>> I am drawing the line
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:24:59PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
> >
> > I am not interested in supporting old Alphas without BWX anymore.
> > I am drawing the line. Either someone steps up to support non-BWX
> > Alpha and prom
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
>
> I am not interested in supporting old Alphas without BWX anymore.
> I am drawing the line. Either someone steps up to support non-BWX
> Alpha and promptly fixes glibc or the architecture baseline is
> increased to include BWX (thereby fix
On 12.12.22 09:17, Michael Cree wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 08:56:40AM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Dear Michael,
On 12.12.22 08:27, Michael Cree wrote:
With the usrmerge uploads now depending on a recent libc version Alpha
is now dead in the water. Nothing can be built. Thus we have t
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 09:02:23AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Frank!
>
> > On Dec 12, 2022, at 8:57 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure I fully understand the issue here:
> >
> > See, glibc used to work for alpha up until 2.33 as I read. Then a change
> > broke it f
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 08:56:40AM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> On 12.12.22 08:27, Michael Cree wrote:
> > With the usrmerge uploads now depending on a recent libc version Alpha
> > is now dead in the water. Nothing can be built. Thus we have to fix
> > glibc to continue buil
Hi Frank!
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 8:57 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I fully understand the issue here:
>
> See, glibc used to work for alpha up until 2.33 as I read. Then a change
> broke it for alpha with 2.34. Does the respective glibc maintainer for
> alpha (Richard Henderson acc
Dear Michael,
On 12.12.22 08:27, Michael Cree wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 01:47:59PM +0100, Frank Scheiner wrote:
On 20.11.22 10:03, Michael Cree wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:45:17AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I just noticed that there is a regression in glibc on alpha wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
