On 2023-05-14 22:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, 2023-05-14 at 21:53 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Therefore the libc6.1-alphaev67 package will be removed from the debian
> > package with glibc 2.37. We can take the opportunity to raise the
&
Hi,
On 2021-09-02 23:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-25 13:47, Michael Cree wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:59:32PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I would therefore like to discuss the future of the libc6.1-alphaev67
> > > package on al
Hi,
On 2021-08-25 13:47, Michael Cree wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:59:32PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I would therefore like to discuss the future of the libc6.1-alphaev67
> > package on alpha. According to popcon, to take with a grain of salt
> > given the low
On 2021-08-25 07:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 8/24/21 10:59 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > With the removal of the libc6-xen package in glibc 2.32, the only
> > package still using the hwcap infrastructure is libc6.1-alphaev67. The
> > hwcap
really useful in terms of
performance, or if the architecture baseline can be raised to ev67, or
to a ev6 as a compromise. The goal is to stop building this package.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http
nment fails [1]:
Nope that's a different issue. The log shows that libcrypt1 is correctly
installed before libc6.1 is configured.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
n glibc issue in this case.
This is actually glibc issue, see:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24986
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-09/msg00152.html
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
On 2019-09-01 21:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2019-07-17 20:36, Michael Cree wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:54:40PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > > First, "systemd" still cannot handle systems with persistent filesystems
> > > other than "/"
local-fs.target/start failed
with result 'dependency'.
[ OK ] Started Emergency Shell.
[ OK ] Reached target Emergency Mode.
...
You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" to view
system logs, "systemctl reboot" to reboot, "sys
he gcc repository? Would it be possible to stop using
that outdated embedded copy and use the debian libffi package instead?
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
On 2019-05-25 13:00, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Em sáb, 25 de mai de 2019 às 10:57, Aurelien Jarno
> escreveu:
> >
> > kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 have now been moved to debian-ports. As
> > hurd-i386 has been moved earlier, it means that al
Hi,
On 2019-04-24 12:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15381 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > > > It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
> > > Ok. How much? Is 6 or 8 weeks better? I don't think, given how long this
> > >
On 2019-04-13 17:01, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15371 March 1977, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > > How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the
> > > time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks.
>
> > The process to inject all pack
an inject that in the debian-ports archive.
It would be nice to have a bit more than 2 weeks to do all of that.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
existing interface, that probably wasn't done
the best way on alpha as it's one of the first 64-bit platforms in
glibc. The structures can't be easily changed without breaking the
world. It should however be possible to use symbol versioning to
provide a new version of all the functions affected by this change.
If some alpha porters have the motivation to do so, it should be
coordinated upstream. Otherwise vim should have to be fixed.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
on:
<https://www.ports.debian.org/archive_2018.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2018.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
signatu
On 2016-05-28 13:44, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > APT archive
> > ---
> > The APT archive is now accessible on ftp.ports.debian.org [2], which
> > maps to 2 machines, one in The Netherlands and one in the USA. Here
> > are
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/Europe/2016/DSC#Events
[2] http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/
[3] http://deb.debian.org/
[4] http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports-cd/
[5] https://www.ports.debian.org
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@au
well on:
<http://ftp.debian-ports.org/archive/archive_2016.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2016.key
Description: applicati
well on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2015.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2015.key
Description: applicati
o you know what could be wrong?
This morning it seems the Packages list is fine, and that the packages
correctly appear on package.d.o. I guess there was a small glitch in the
previous install run.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel
E5E9 8231 AA65 1E74 623D B0B8
uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2014)
It can be found as well on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2014.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 102
ll on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2014.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2014.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
si
gt; on how I should proceed.
I would say stop doing manual upload and start the build daemons.
> Best solution would probably be, if the wanna-build database rescans what's in
> the archive already. Is this possible?
Yes, I can re-enable the hppa wanna-build database if it is act
t a question about any objections, but about a call to the ppc64
> porters if they are able to maintain such a port in Debian. There is no
> response yet.
>
Hiroyuki Yamamoto is the porter behind ppc64, so please consider that as
an answer.
--
Aurelien Jarno
.debian.org and is kept
> in
> another place.
>
hppa porters have ignored my emails during a few years, and then started
to write me during a few more years using an email address that went
to /dev/null, so they never got my answers, and thus never answered me...
This is true th
ll on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2013.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2013.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
ll on:
<http://archive.debian-ports.org/archive_2012.key>
Or attached to this mail.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
archive_2012.key
Description: application/pgp-keys
si
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:27:25AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
>
> On 6-Jul-11, at 1:37 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > You can send them to debian-glibc@lists.d.o, so that they are included
> > in the source package. For getting them on debian-ports, someone
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:00:27AM -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
>
>
> --On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:31:02 PM -0400 Carlos O'Donell
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >>Hi Alpha and HPPA porters,
> >>
> >
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:31:02PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi Alpha and HPPA porters,
> >
> > Thanks to the DSA team, we now have a new machine with plenty of
> > available space to run debian-port
case, latest version of highligh is not built
on alpha [1].
Someone has to provide alpha build daemons to get that fixed.
[1] http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=highlight
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net
ain/w/wordplay/wordplay_7.22-17_alpha.deb
debian/pool/main/w/wp2x/wp2x_2.5-mhi-9_alpha.deb
[3] http://packages.debian.org/debian-ports-archive-keyring
[4] http://www.debian-ports.org/mirrors
[5] http://www.debian-ports.org/archive
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
this week, at
> least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. GCC 4.6 apparently will be
If you do the switch, please also add mips and mipsel, that would avoid
you to have to complain in two weeks that these architectures have not
yet been switched.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG:
igned mail from a Debian Developer).
It's easier than having to process individual requests.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:49:46PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 03/04/11 02:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >Note that contrary to what a lot of people think, debian-ports is not
> >part of the Debian infrastructure. It is run by (not enough) volunteers,
> >partly on De
nd I am the one who spent time
to write most of them.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 03:41:17PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:00:26PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Mark Hymers wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >&
ling of a couple of DDs?
> Or did I miss the bit that said "not releasing in time equals archive
> removal"?
ftpmasters are not a couple DD, but DPL delegates. As such, they can
take decisions regarding the archive.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
au
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi alpha porters,
>
> I am trying to get eglibc 2.13 ready to get uploaded into unstable. I
> have done the missing porting work on alpha, but I am now stuck with
> testsuite regressions, and I would need help to fix
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> This one is caused by the new strncmp() tests which fail on alpha.
> This is not strictly speaking a regression (I mean strncmp() was
> already broken in eglibc 2.11), so I can easily ignore this test if
> the p
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> - tst-chk2.out, Error 127
> - tst-chk3.out, Error 127
> - tst-chk5.out, Error 127
> - tst-chk6.out, Error 127
> - tst-lfschk2.out, Error 127
> - tst-lfschk3.out, Error 127
> - tst-lfschk5.out, Error 127
>
they seems to be broken as they trigger these
testsuite errors. We can put back the version used in eglibc 2.11 if
the porters agree.
All in all if the -fexception issue is solved, we can have a "working"
eglibc on alpha. Help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
Aure
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/26/2009 04:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Knowing that $31 could be used for prefetch, I have modified the
>> assembly code from memchr.S to use it. It passes all the testsuite.
>>
>
> This isn&
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:45:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
> > >>>
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
> >>>>> The problem is that the memchr() function on alpha uses prefetch, which
> &
led "prefetch" in the code, but it is more like "read a value
in advance".
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:16:16PM -0300, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:24:00PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >&
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:24:00PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > With a lot of patches (E)GLIBC 2.10 builds on alpha, but it fails on the
> > testsuite for the memchr() function, which is an optimized assemb
.
It would be nice if someone can fix the assembly code so that the
prefetching does not create memory faults. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
test-memchr.tar.gz
Descri
the lack of manpower is clearly the problem on the alpha
port, this means a move to debian-ports.org implies a reduced set of
packages.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-a
oks like by accident.
This machine has been setup, it is called albeniz.debian.org, that's why
the bug has been closed.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-1
Severity: important
Trying to build glibc 2.6 on alpha leads to a regression in
the test dlfcn/tst-dlinfo. This test segfaults when used with a glibc
built with gcc-4.2 whereas the same binaries works when used with a
glibc built with gcc-4.1.
-- System Informati
s not yet tested
CC = gcc-4.1
CXX = g++-4.1
BUILD_CC = gcc-4.1
- Build the package in the normal way
- Send us libc6.1_2.6-3_alpha.deb or log-test-alpha-linux-gnu-libc
from the build tree
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :'
GALRM from the program is just ignored.
> RUN_TESTSUITE = no
>
Thanks for the test. Unfortunately, reenabling the testsuite in a stable
upload gives too much risk of a failed build. Therefore I prefer to
leave it as now.
Note that test testsuite is enabled again in unstable (N
oot". The .deb files and
> source packages can be found here:
>
Thanks for the patch, I have checked in our SVN repository for the etch
branch. If the stable release managers agree, this patch will be
included in etch r1.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:00:52PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As requested a long time ago in the BTS (bug #229251), I have built
> > an EV67 optimized version of the glibc.
>
> It depends on "tzdata&q
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:05:41PM -0400, Donsbach, Jeff wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > This is only ev67. This is the mentioned architecture in the bug
> report.
> > I know almost nothing about alpha CPUs, but it seems EV67 is the CPU
> for which the gain would
> >
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
[Please keep debian-glibc in Cc: as I am not subscribed to debian-alpha]
Hi alpha users!
As requested a long time ago in the BTS (bug #229251), I have built an
EV67 optimized version of the glibc. It uses EV67 specific
instructions, but also optimized assembly code for
work it's a good sign. Then use ldd to verify those libraries are not
used. Note that in case of problem a rm -rf /lib/ev67 should make your
system working again.
The packages are available on http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/ev67
Good tests!
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
.
e gcc 4.1 fixes the problem, but the resulting glibc has not
been tested.
I think compilers are critical for the glibc, so we will have to
coordinate the changes.
Aurélien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Elect
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:54:15AM -0600, Kelledin wrote:
> "gp-relative relocation" means something needs to be compiled
> with -fPIC (probably kwave's libmad in this case). Remove and
> re-extract the source tree, export LDFLAGS="-fPIC", and try the
> build again.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:
(Please Cc me as I am not subscribed to the list)
Hi all,
I saw this when attempting to build kwave on alpha:
/usr/bin/ld: /build/buildd/kwave-0.6.5/libmad/.libs/libmad.a(timer.o):
gp-relative relocation against dynamic symbol mad_timer_zero
/usr/bin/ld: /build/buildd/kwave-0.6.5/libmad/.libs/l
64 matches
Mail list logo
