Alpha team,
On 14 July 2008 at 02:43, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:12:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > r-base 2.7.1-1 is listed as 19 days old and waiting for Alpha, but has
| > seemingly been built on Alpha.
|
| "Built" means that it s
Rpy is lagging on alpha and hppa. When 0.4.6-3 came out, both failed simply
because they hadn't rebuilt the new R year. That is done, so please rebuild
rpy.
Without rpy, R cannot move to testing, which then holds up loads of little
packages depending on R (binary package r-base-core).
If I over
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:39:11AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: time
> Version: 1.7-12
> Severity: serious
>
> The current source fail to build on alpha. The problem is that
> configure fail to detect a working wait3(),
Correct, that would be a problem in autoconf.
> but the
7;t tell us.
Any debian-alpha people here who could comment on this? Should we add an
additional "or if ALPHA_LINUX" on Alpha?
Dirk
> I do not have an alpha, so I can't suggest any workarounds. This bug
> is serious as it keeps the latest version out of Woody. From
> upd
[ Sorry, resending 2nd time, I am having a slow morning. Should be fixed now ]
Ivan> Package: quantlib-python
Ivan> Version: 0.2.0-3
Ivan> Severity: serious
Ivan> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
[...]
Ivan> copying QuantLib/__init__.py -> build/lib.linux-alph
[ Sorry, resending, had debian-alpha address messed up. --edd ]
Ivan> Package: quantlib-python
Ivan> Version: 0.2.0-3
Ivan> Severity: serious
Ivan> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
[...]
Ivan> copying QuantLib/__init__.py -> build/lib.linux-alpha-2.1/QuantLib
reassign 94137 gcc
thanks
Ok, this one might be easy to close for the gcc folks as it appears to fixed
in newer versions; I am reassigned mostly for record keeping purposes.
Thanks, Dirk
"Andras" == Major A writes:
Andras> SUMMARY
Andras>
Andras> Thanks all for the debugging info. Th
7 matches
Mail list logo
