Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > > As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request > that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and > update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures. > Everyone, please avoi

Re: ftp.debian-ports.org status

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 07:45:36 -0600, Bob Tracy wrote: > The subject system has been unreachable for at least the past 12 hours. > Scheduled maintenance? Hardware failure? Backhoe-induced network > outage or power failure? > https://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2016/03/ms

Re: maintainer communication

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 22:14:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > My intent in _this_ thread was to get a discussion among > debian-ports.org users started for best practices of how > to communicate with package maintainers in Debian. Sorry > for being unclear there. I had hoped for hints ☺ since I

Re: new X server doesn't find input devices

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 21:08:11 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > Dunno... Something in the hal <--> dbus <--> udev chain might be broken, > or maybe the mechanism Xserver uses to access what hal knows about isn't > quite right. Regardless, the workaround enables the desired/expected > Xserver behavior

Re: Advancing Debian Alpha Porting

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:37:53 +1200, Michael Cree wrote: > What's the procedure for getting login access to the porter box? http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >>For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs > >>(turning

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit : > >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to so

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs > (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The > rationale is summarized in > http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know > about i

Re: clock disparity on buildd?

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:06:50 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Will affected packages be rescheduled once the clock is fixed? > debian-al...@ldo is not the contact address for the buildd admins. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFH: #564620

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:43:07 +0300, Radu Spineanu wrote: > Hi guys, > > One of the packages I maintain fails to build on alpha. The bug report > is here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564620 > You're using va_list as if it's a pointer type. It isn't. The patch below

Re: /debian/dists/testing/Contents-alpha* missing

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:19 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > Has "testing" officially gone bye-bye for Alpha? Yes. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: X11 server on alpha -- update

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:38:11 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > The above rant is my curious way of acknowledging the hard work Debian > developers do to make things "just work." I'm *extremely* grateful that > I don't normally have to deal with the minutiae that are part and parcel > of their lives a

Re: X11 server on alpha -- update

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:04:02 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > (II) LoadModule: "int10" > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libint10.so > dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libint10.so: undefined symbol: _alpha_inb > (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libint10.so > (II) UnloadModule: "int10" > (EE)

Re: [gentoo-alpha] Need X testers on Alpha. I think we've got it this time.

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:05:32 -0400, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > Not a Debian user either, but I believe... > > > > apt-get build-dep > > > > ...should do the trick, more or less. > > Thanks. I just wonder if it'll pull in the needed versions?

Re: [BUG] recent squeeze X11 updates causing SIGSEGV on startup

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:27:28 -0400, Matt Turner wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report. I was getting the exact same failure as you. > > The crash happens in xf86SlowBCopyFromBus, which seems to be totally > useless. So I killed that code: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?i

Re: Bug#544862: libsynthesis: FTBFS on alpha

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 08:54:37 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > sysync/debuglogger.cpp: In member function 'virtual void > sysync::TDebugLoggerBase::DebugOpenBlock(const char*, const char*, bool)': > sysync/debuglogger.cpp:606: error: no matching function for call to > 'sysync::TDebugLoggerBase::

Re: Access to developer machine

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 19:35 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > 1. The box available for developers is albeniz, right? Correct. > 2. Since this is the first time I request to use such a service, is > there any documentation on how to work on the machine? (Like > "use chroot X".

Re: The State of Alpha Linux

On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:32 -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > No, I don't think this is the problem at all. jcristau, the developer > who told me he didn't care, has at least one alpha. > I used to have (remote) access to an alpha. I don't anymore (other than Debian's port machine). Cheers, Julien -

Re: Bug#490881: give back (on alpha only) and unblock jfsutils

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 22:32:01 +0200, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: >> This is a toolchain issue on alpha; Please link using -Wl,--no-relax. >> >> debian-alpha@lists.debian.org is a better place to ask for help than the >> buildd contact address. >> > > jfsutils didn't b

Re: hypre stalled on alpha buildd

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 13:22:18 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Hello, > > Any ideas why the alpha buildd still shows "needs build" for hypre after > two weeks? there's still a big backlog as the alpha buildd was more or less down for 2 weeks recently. Things don't seem to be getting better v

Re: Please reschedule build of gnat-4.3 on alpha

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:45:10 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Selon Tim Cutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > albeniz.debian.org is an alpha porter box. It has a sid chroot > > Yes, and? > And you have access to it, and you can request package installations by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Juli

Re: Bug#472205: xorg-server: FTBFS on alpha in hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/axpPci.c

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 18:28:44 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-server&ver=2%3A1.4.99.901-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1206153477&file=log&as=raw > > This needs porting to pciaccess, much of the arch-specific pci handling

Bug#472205: xorg-server: FTBFS on alpha in hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/axpPci.c

Package: xorg-server Version: 2:1.4.99.901-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Forwarded: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15169 http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-server&ver=2%3A1.4.99.901-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1206153477&file=log&as=raw This

Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3 won't boot on alpha (fwd)

On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:01:38 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:08:54AM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > > > And how will we boot 2.6.23 then??? > > > > How should I know? I asked for testing in > >

Re: gclcvs

On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 14:04:09 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! It appears that the asm/system.h header has been removed: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-78;arch=alpha;stamp=1184774486 > > GCL needs this for the imb() assembler routine: > > #define SGC > #i

Re: porting, NMUing opportunities

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 22:43:49 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > The work needed on each package ranges anywhere from prodding the maintainer > about a promised upload, to NMUing with patches in the BTS, to deciphering > obscure build failures. :-) Any takers? > Hi, I just had a look at mtasc (#

Re: Failed installing linux-image-2.6.17-2-alpha-smp

On Tue, Dec 5, 2006 at 10:50:47 -0800, acon wrote: > Thanks Norbert, but i cant find any kernel newer than 2.6.17 in > testing repositories: > > apt-cache search linux-image-2.6 > llinux-image-2.6-alpha-generic - Linux kernel 2.6 image on Alpha > linux-image-2.6-alpha-legacy - Linux kernel 2.6

Re: Bug#335578: ocamlopt.opt segfaults on Alpha

-gcc from the Mail-Followup-To. Cheers, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335578: ocamlopt.opt segfaults on Alpha

utils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 and libc6.1-dev 2.3.5-5. Does anyone know of an alpha-related change in the toolchain between these versions, which could have caused this? Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a meaningful backtrace with gdb (I only know that the segfault occurs at program startup). Than

Re: beta status

[ please Cc: me as I'm not subscribed to -alpha and -boot ] On Wed, Nov 2, 2005 at 21:38:11 +0000, Julien Cristau wrote: > I just tried building debian-installer on alpha, but I got the same > problem as the buildd. With MKLIBS = mklibs -v, I get the output at <http://per

Re: beta status

ldd. The __libc_global_ctors symbol is undefined in tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libc.so.6.1-so and tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libc.so.6.1-so-stripped. However, I'm not an alpha expert, so I don't know how to debug this problem :/ Cheers, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: X.Org 6.9 Needs Your Build Logs!

On Sat, Oct 8, 2005 at 00:25:57 +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I just tried to build xorg-x11 from current svn on alpha. > > It failed in xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/dri/r128/r128_ioctl.c, with what > > looks like a missi

Re: X.Org 6.9 Needs Your Build Logs!

og is available at <http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/julien.cristau/xorg-x11_6.8.99.900_alpha.log>. Cheers, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]