good day all ...
has anyone gotten kernel-image-2.6-smp 2.6.15-8 to boot? i've been playing a bit
more this morning, kernel-image-2.4.27-2-smp boots, but cannot run correctly
due
to udev i think, but at least boots. 2.6.15-8 fails to boot at all with what
seems
to be symbols errors (it runs
what is the correct method to upgrade kernels via apt? i've install the smp
kernel
with apt and now in /boot there is:
odin:/boot# ls -l
total 16999
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 88064 2004-09-06 01:42 bootlx
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 59030 2006-03-06 07:23 config-2.6.15-1-alpha-generic
-rw-r--r-- 1
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
do i just need to move the links from 2.6.15-1-alpha-generic to
2.6.15-1-alpha-smp?
How does your /etc/aboot.conf look like (or /boot/etc/aboot.conf)?
Greetings
Helge
looks like this helge:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:34:45AM -0400, Tyson Whitehead wrote:
Aboot looks for the file [partition]/etc/aboot.conf (where parition is
hardcoded into it and can be viewed and set via the abootconf program) to
tell it what kernel and initrd image to load. I'm guessing you /boot is on a
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:59:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What version of SRM do you have?
Cheers,
show version reports Alpha Server ES40 v5.6-102. sarge netinst cd seems to
work just fine :-\
-- michael
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:23:24PM +0200, Marc Schlensog wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:59:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What version of SRM do you have?
Cheers,
show version reports Alpha Server ES40 v5.6-102. sarge netinst cd
seems to work just fine :-\
indeed,
is this not a bootable iso image?
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/alpha/iso-cd/debian-testing-alpha-netinst.iso
i built a copy today and it just drops me into aboot when i try to boot it. and
l in aboot
does not list any useable configurations.
-- michael
--
i've had debian runnin on a herd (20, but they are slowly dieing off) of ES40's
for nearly two years. they are not super fast, by todays standards, but they
are
quite stable:
uname -a
Linux dove-01 2.4.26-1-smp #1 SMP Sat May 1 17:27:38 EST 2004 alpha GNU/Linux
dove-01:~# uptime
07:30:13 up
dan ...
i had the same problem with my ES40's, i just changed the /etc/modules
file to load the eepro driver at boot:
dove-01:/etc# more modules
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
# to be loaded at boot time,
good day all ...
was wanting to play with current builds on one of me ES40 boxes and find it
fails to boot. was using the netinstall image from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/current/
and booting from SRM console with boot dqa0 -flags 0 boot process hangs at the
Hi Norbert!
not a problem, as i said, i was only dabbling anyway. i'll keep an eye out for
the new installer. thanks!
-- michael
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
Sorry, that was my fault.
In a moment of insanity I changed the kernel configurations so ext2fs
support was
Hi Norbert!
that seems to indicating problems with MILO and the big alphas, i was using
SRM and as i said, installed SID last fall without much problem :-\
-- michael
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Michael Galloway wrote:
was wanting to play
Moin Helge!
no, thats the other interesting part, master and clone will boot systemA, where
the cloneing took place, neither will boot systemB or C or ...
as near as i can tell all 20 are identical, there were part of one of the
earlier supercomputing efforts at the lab, all the same nodes.
i
Hi Steve!
ok, so what is the real functional difference?
-- michael
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
sarge is the upcoming stable release.
sid is the staging ground for everything that will go into the stable
release being developed at any given moment.
ok, i'm getting myself very confused and maybe some one can give me a sanity
check.
i have a number of ES40's i'm putting sarge onto. i have it installed and
working fairly well.
now i'm trying to clone the disk image for the rest of the ES40's, this is
what i'm trying:
SystemA: good install
sorry, just wanted to resend this with a correct subject line :-|
ok, i'm getting myself very confused and maybe some one can give me a sanity
check.
i have a number of ES40's i'm putting sarge onto. i have it installed and
working fairly well.
now i'm trying to clone the disk image for the
Moin Helge!
maybe typos in there, the system is on serial console so i copied from my
notes ...
i normally boot 0
the interesting part is the clone disk boots fine on the original system, but
not on either of the other systems.
-- michael
Helge Kreutzmann schrieb am Freitag, den 16. Juli
Hi Andrew!
there is a build out from yesterday:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/alpha/20040714/
-- me
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
I don't see anything new at:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
will the build happen today,
Hi Andrew!
i've better success on my ES40's with the 20040713 build:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/alpha/
still somewhat problematic, it installs e100 instead of eepro100, but it may
work ok for you ...
-- michael
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
hello: I
good day all ...
it's been suggested to my that i give debian a try on my herd of AS250's. i've
been trying without success to get SuSE6.4 to boot. which dist. is the best
for me to get started with, stable or potato?
-- michael
20 matches
Mail list logo
