Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 22:46 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in > it so that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one > architecture, send a mail to that list asking for help. PS: when filing architecture-specific bugs, ple

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE > joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to use > resources hosted by Marist. > > I wonder if it makes sense to reach out, and see if there are >

Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?

2015-07-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list > which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all > porters should be aware of. We have debian-devel-announce for that, the ex

Guide to getting ported?

2015-04-30 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Do any porters have any input on this page? https://wiki.debian.org/GettingPorted -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#730258: please add arch-specific BTS tags

2013-11-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > These are the list of ports that I see: I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldstable -> experimental on ftp.d.o, ftp.d-p.o and maybe archive.d.o. We have

Re: Bug#532447: xulrunner_1.9.0.10-1(alpha/unstable): FTBFS on alpha - test failure

2009-08-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 14:20 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > But the previous version, 1.9.1-1, failed, and there is really no > > difference in 1.9.1.1-1 that would explain that. > > > > On the other hand, 1.9.1-1 was built with: > > Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-13

Re: Debian: removal of libffm (#399354): info / maintainer / work needed

2007-11-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:35 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Thanks for the explanations. > Too bad my alpha died or I'd still keep it up. :-( Perhaps you could use the developer/porter machine? http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=albeniz -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise sign

Debian: removal of libffm (#399354): info / maintainer / work needed

2007-11-27 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, libffm (fast math library for alpha) may be removed from Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/399354 Is it useful to have libffm on alpha? Is the libm from glibc 2.7 slower than the routines from libffm? If so, perhaps they should be ported to and merged into glibc? Is there anyone with alpha

synfig: 367048: can anyone help with a floating point exception?

2006-06-11 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Does anyone here feel like helping out with a FTBFS in synfigstudio due to a floating point exception in synfig on alpha? If someone could get a backtrace, or a patch or other hint, that would be great. Steps to reproduce: sudo aptitude install synfig synfig-dbg mkdir tmp ; cd tmp wget