(sorry for jumping in late here)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:51:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> > joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to
Hi,
(haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Alexander Wirt dixit:
Could you
On 14-06-13 21:11, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Wouter, Mikael: input on switching C/C++ to 4.8?
We don't have much data either way, do we?
I suppose it shouldn't be too much of a problem, but I can't be sure. In
the past we've usually taken the plunge, and filed bugs if things go
really bad.
--
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:22:19AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the
porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the
usertag (e.g., 'debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I've often thought that it would be useful to have tags in the BTS so
that users or maintainers could mark a bug as specific to a particular
architecture. This way, when I have some spare time, I could go to the
BTS, fetch a list of bugs that are specific to an architecture I care
about, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Craig Small wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 11:39:16PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
I've put together a new version of mpg123 (non-free) that I'd love to
plonk into woody. So if you have an alpha or m68k machine with a few
6 matches
Mail list logo
