Re: Moving alpha and hppa architectures to debian-ports.org

2011-07-06 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:27:25AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: On 6-Jul-11, at 1:37 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote: You can send them to

Re: Architecture usertags

2009-03-03 Thread dann frazier
, objections, or suggestions to improve this proposal? Thanks, Excellent news.This will come very handy.Thanks. +1 -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-09 Thread dann frazier
that as well, else we'll migrate ruby1.9 -9 without hppa. Please reply to this mail if you won't be uploading for hppa, so that we can take the manual action needed. I'd be happy to do a manual upload for hppa if it would build, but this isn't just a problem with the buildds :( -- dann frazier

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-09 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote: * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: Please upload a manual build this time. If you're

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-06 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:51:15PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha. On hppa, it's caused

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-05 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha. On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, which was partially fixed (at least the kernel doesn't

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

2009-02-02 Thread dann frazier
admin anyway) - I just want to set your expectations. On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter machines do work, though. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: [stable] aboot - support recent kernels, fix build issues

2008-06-05 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:32:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: Hi, * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080527 10:56]: etch's aboot doesn't permit booting recent 2.6 kernels. While backporting a fix for this issue, I ran into a couple of other build issues that prevent etch's aboot from

Re: aboot update for etch

2008-06-05 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:18:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Dann, On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:16:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: hey Steve, Helge, I've put together an updated etch aboot package that includes the fix for booting = 2.6.23 kernels (e.g., the etchnhalf kernel

Re: [stable] aboot - support recent kernels, fix build issues

2008-06-05 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 02:35:22PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 02:56 -0600, dann frazier wrote: Other than the testing I mentioned above, I've also had successful test reports from Bdale and Tim Cutts (on albeniz.d.o, iirc). For completeness, let me report details

[stable] aboot - support recent kernels, fix build issues

2008-05-27 Thread dann frazier
(on albeniz.d.o, iirc). This is obviously a requirement for alpha support in etchnhalf since 2.6.24 adds the ELF header incompatability. (Though releasing w/o alpha support is an option as well). -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: [stable] aboot - support recent kernels, fix build issues

2008-05-27 Thread dann frazier
it was anything original from my side, i typically just port other people's work ;) -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [stable] aboot - support recent kernels, fix build issues

2008-05-27 Thread dann frazier
, they can still revert to their existing 2.6.18 image. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

aboot update for etch

2008-05-14 Thread dann frazier
sections in 2.6.23rc1 and + above don't cause load failures. Thanks to Richard Henderson for the + patch. + + -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 14 May 2008 02:38:35 -0600 + aboot (0.9b-3) unstable; urgency=low * Synced man pages with upstream: aboot.conf.sgml, aboot.sgml, diff

Re: Request to test a G77 bug on 64-bit platforms

2005-09-22 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:47 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Could I request someone to test for the presence of a G77 bug on 64-bit platforms? Please install g77 and gcc on a *Sid* machine and ensure that gcc is a symlink to gcc-4.0