Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#666142: Bug#666142: octave: Please support -mieee option to mkoctfile

2012-04-01 Thread Bill MacAllister
--On Sunday, April 01, 2012 01:27:00 PM +1200 Michael Cree mc...@orcon.net.nz wrote: Maybe. My understanding is that the official Alpha buildd and porterbox are to be decommisioned when they are no longer needed for Lenny, but I don't know if that has happened or not. Let's be clear: if I

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#666142: Bug#666142: octave: Please support -mieee option to mkoctfile

2012-04-01 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 01:27:00PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote: If albeniz has been decommissioned then an unofficial Alpha porterbox will need to be made available to Debian Developers, however I personally can't attend to that for at least three weeks. I already asked DSA about it, but indeed

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#666142: Bug#666142: octave: Please support -mieee option to mkoctfile

2012-03-31 Thread Michael Cree
On 31/03/12 02:03, Thomas Weber wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:07:50PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On 30/03/12 06:04, Thomas Weber wrote: How can I get access to an unstable sid chroot on alpha? Is DSA involved in this as outlined in http://dsa.debian.org/doc/install-req/? Maybe. My

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#666142: Bug#666142: octave: Please support -mieee option to mkoctfile

2012-03-30 Thread Thomas Weber
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:07:50PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On 30/03/12 06:04, Thomas Weber wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:30:11PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: On 29/03/12 17:20, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Source: octave Version: 3.6.1-4 octave-octcdf FTBFS on Alpha. (maybe on sh4