Re: Debian 2.2(potato)Alpha-no lpd?

2001-03-09 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 08 Mar 2001, mel kravitz wrote: > Thanks Paul, printing works fine now- is a hand tool. > Kernel compile question: kernel-source all i need? or will i be missing > .headers or .c compiler? You can also simply download the official kernel sources from a kernel.org mirror, that's generally

Debian 2.2(potato)Alpha-no lpd?

2001-03-08 Thread mel kravitz
Thanks Paul, printing works fine now- is a hand tool. Kernel compile question: kernel-source all i need? or will i be missing .headers or .c compiler? -Mel

Re: [Fwd: Debian 2.2(potato)Alpha-no lpd?]

2001-03-08 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 07 Mar 2001, mel kravitz wrote: > i have a fully operational > system, however i don't seem to have lpd in /sbin or /usr/sbin? > Something i did? > I assume the print daemon is installed as part of the 'base.tgz' binary? No, the base system is just that, very basic. If you want a printing

[Fwd: Debian 2.2(potato)Alpha-no lpd?]

2001-03-07 Thread mel kravitz
--- Begin Message --- Hi, I installed 2.2 on a DEC 600au -second scsi disk, first has NetBSD1.5 , i have a fully operational system, however i don't seem to have lpd in /sbin or /usr/sbin? Something i did? I assume the print daemon is installed as part of the 'base.tgz' binary? How do i 'fix' this