Hello !
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:16:57PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
> BTW, I've duplicated this problem on an LX164 under RH 7.0 with the
> Mach64 server - works with 2.2.17 kernel, fails with 2.4.1... :-\
I have an Mach 64 based card and it works fine under
2.0.xx & Xfree 3.x (RH 5.1 and up)
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:13:31PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>
> I have a Permedia 2 based card (Diamond FireGL 2) in my SX164, and it
> also doesn't work properly with XFree 4 (pixmaps get corrupted.
> Usually, I try to fix bugs myself, but I have no idea how to debug
> this...). OTOH, this can
Jay Estabrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be careful about the card you choose - some of the most recent cards
> don't always work with the BIOS emulator that is in the consoles of
> the older machines. Rage128 and Radeon are fine in LX/SX, and have
> the added benefit of running OpenGL apps via
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 09:13:25PM +0100, Fabrice Haberer-Proust wrote:
>
> I guess that you spent a lot of time to find a solution to this problem,
> and I would like to thank you very much for it.
No problem; it gave me a chance to look at the Mach64 again...
> I will follow your suggestion: f
Hello,
I guess that you spent a lot of time to find a solution to this problem,
and I would like to thank you very much for it.
I will follow your suggestion: first compile and install XFree86 4.x, and
then buy a new graphic card.
> if you really must go to a 2.4 kernel
In fact, I miss only on
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 09:05:29AM +0100, Fabrice Haberer-Proust wrote:
>
> > If possible, see if the server has "verbose" mode, maybe it will output
> > a few more messages that might give us a clue.
>
> The Xserver(1) man page says something about an -audit option, set by
> default to 1 and that
> If possible, see if the server has "verbose" mode, maybe it will output
> a few more messages that might give us a clue.
The Xserver(1) man page says something about an -audit option, set by
default to 1 and that should "additionally reports all successful
connections and disconnect". But I don'
Hello,
that's funny that you talk about the loop device: I wanted to have it
(simply because I often use it), but the kernel compilation crashed on an
error about this function deactivate_page. After having deleted the two
calls to this function, as you told me, I could successfully compile the
2.
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:52:39PM +0100, Fabrice Haberer-Proust wrote:
>
> > Also, posting the following might help:
> >
> > 1. .config for the 2.4.12/14 kernel,
> > 2. lspci -v under both 2.4.x and 2.2.x
> > 3. /etc/X11/XF86Config
>
> I joined these files (however, I can't give you .conf
> I seem to remember that something might have been broken in 2.4.12;
> could you try with 2.4.14?
I just tried with a 2.4.14 kernel, and then with a 2.4.13 kernel. I get
exactly the same error (cmp does not show any difference between the log
files).
I also tested these 2.4.x kernel with the SuS
My bad...I was thinking Mach32. Ignore me :-P
C
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Fabrice Haberer-Proust wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Mach64 cards aren't supported on Alpha,
>
> Are you sure?
>
> I've been using Linux with my Alpha since two years and more. At the very
> beginning, I had an ATI card and X worked p
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:29:16PM +0100, Fabrice Haberer-Proust wrote:
>
> I've been using Linux with my Alpha since two years and more. At the very
> beginning, I had an ATI card and X worked perfectly with RedHat 5.3. Now,
> I am writting this message under X with SuSE 7.0 an another ATI card.
Hi,
> Mach64 cards aren't supported on Alpha,
Are you sure?
I've been using Linux with my Alpha since two years and more. At the very
beginning, I had an ATI card and X worked perfectly with RedHat 5.3. Now,
I am writting this message under X with SuSE 7.0 an another ATI card.
But, much more im
13 matches
Mail list logo
