[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running an ATI 3D Rage Pro 215GP PCI card on a i386. Works fine on ker=
> nel 2.6.16 and Xorg 7.1.1. It's not the same card as yours, so guess it
> doesn'=
> I also have the same in my PWS500au. Its running fine under kernel 2.6.16 =
> and=20
> Xorg 7.0.0. Here a
Yes it does have AGP slot indeed. Also I have tested G200 matrox card
with it with lockup without
white blinking display is it does with ATI Technologies Inc RV280
card. Both cards runs with AGP, I do not have any PCI cards to test it
with at this moment. :)
Joni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EM
On Fri October 13 2006 05:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To clarify X hasn't worked since the move from 6.9 but it does run. I get
> an impressionist image and moveable square which represents the mouse, as I
> can move it about. My suspicion is some change to the PCI code/memory map
> as I imagine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Strange. I have UP1100 motherboard with ATI Technologies Inc RV280
> [Radeon 9200 PRO] controller and total lock up still after unstable was
> going for Xorg instead of XFree86. Kernel is self compiled 2.16.18 for
> "nautilus". The hardware setup is almost the same and y
Strange. I have UP1100 motherboard with ATI Technologies Inc RV280
[Radeon 9200 PRO] controller and total lock up still after unstable was
going for Xorg instead of XFree86. Kernel is self compiled 2.16.18 for
"nautilus". The hardware setup is almost the same and you have no
problems.. ?
Anyway t
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 01:36 -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
> Heh, I was somehow expecting it to drop me back into a firmware prompt.
> After a reboot the bits seemed to still be around, so I attached the
> output of "ser pim". This was with the G200, xorg 7.1.0-1, on the c3700.
> Nothing from Xorg.0.l
ebian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Assunto: Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Ivan Jager wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
>> ...
>>> Then it will start cycling between:
&g
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Ivan Jager wrote:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
...
Then it will start cycling between:
FLT 500B SYS BD bus timeout
FLT CB74 SYS BD bad os HPMC cksm
FLT CBFC SYS BD OS HPMC br err
FLT CBF0 SYS BD HPMC in
Ivan Jager wrote:
> Yes. Um, for people on debian-alpha: I guess I should have explicitly said
> I was crossposting to avoid confusion. The fbdev driver with G200 is
> working on hppa now. (I only tried fbdev with the radeon on alpha, and
> that didn't work.)
For the one or two of us reading th
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
...
Then it will start cycling between:
FLT 500B SYS BD bus timeout
FLT CB74 SYS BD bad os HPMC cksm
FLT CBFC SYS BD OS HPMC br err
FLT CBF0 SYS BD HPMC initiated
To paraphrase, the chassis c
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
...
> Then it will start cycling between:
> FLT 500B SYS BD bus timeout
> FLT CB74 SYS BD bad os HPMC cksm
> FLT CBFC SYS BD OS HPMC br err
> FLT CBF0 SYS BD HPMC initiated
To paraphrase, the chassis codes mean:
o Someone accessed an addr
alpha@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
Assunto: Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable
Ivan Jager wrote:
> Can anyone else with an mga or radeon check whether it is in fact
> broken on hppa?
>
> I'm currently using the fbdev driver with the G200. I can't vouch fo
Ivan Jager wrote:
> Can anyone else with an mga or radeon check whether it is in fact broken
> on hppa?
>
> I'm currently using the fbdev driver with the G200. I can't vouch for
> it's stability, but it seems to be working.
This is encouraging.
Haven't tried fbdev on Alpha with 7.1, but it was
http://www.parisc-linux.org/faq/graphics-howto.html
Look for "Which non-HP PCI graphics cards work with PA-RISC Linux?"
On 10/1/06, Ivan Jager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Bob Tracy wrote:
>> Tomorrow I'll try yanking the ATI card and putting the old TGA2 b
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Bob Tracy wrote:
Bob Tracy wrote:
Tomorrow I'll try yanking the ATI card and putting the old TGA2 back in,
just to see if Xorg 7.1 will work with the hardware that worked back in
the 6.8 days.
The good (I think) news is that the TGA2 works fine with the latest
Xorg 7.1 and
Bob Tracy wrote:
> Tomorrow I'll try yanking the ATI card and putting the old TGA2 back in,
> just to see if Xorg 7.1 will work with the hardware that worked back in
> the 6.8 days.
The good (I think) news is that the TGA2 works fine with the latest
Xorg 7.1 and dependent packages from the unstabl
Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's possible that xserver-xorg-video-all isn't installable yet on alpha;
> there have been some build failures in individual drivers, which may prevent
> having a consistent set of all of them at present.
>
> Anyway, I've tested 7.1 on my system too, and it doesn't look an
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:09:46PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Simon Brown wrote:
> > On 18/09/06 21:10:49, Simon Brown wrote:
> > > On 18/09/06 21:06:11, Simon Brown wrote:
> > >> xserver-xorg-dev (>= 2:1.1.1) is the requirement
> > > Sorry for the excessive mails, this version only exists for i386.
Simon Brown wrote:
> On 18/09/06 21:10:49, Simon Brown wrote:
> > On 18/09/06 21:06:11, Simon Brown wrote:
> >> xserver-xorg-dev (>= 2:1.1.1) is the requirement
> > Sorry for the excessive mails, this version only exists for i386.
> >
> > So we'll just have to wait.
> Xorg 7.1 is now in unstable a
On 18/09/06 21:10:49, Simon Brown wrote:
On 18/09/06 21:06:11, Simon Brown wrote:
xserver-xorg-dev (>= 2:1.1.1) is the requirement
Sorry for the excessive mails, this version only exists for i386.
So we'll just have to wait.
Xorg 7.1 is now in unstable and using xserver-xorg 7.1 and version
On 18/09/06 21:06:11, Simon Brown wrote:
xserver-xorg-dev (>= 2:1.1.1) is the requirement
Sorry for the excessive mails, this version only exists for i386.
So we'll just have to wait.
Simon
On 18/09/06 20:59:13, Simon Brown wrote:
On 14/09/06 21:23:02, Simon Brown wrote:
I'd love to, is there a guide or cheat sheet somewhere to tell me
how to go about it. I'm not yet a Debian wizard.
Does this matter:
bruce:/home/simon# apt-get build-dep xorg xserver-xorg-video-ati
Reading packag
On 14/09/06 21:23:02, Simon Brown wrote:
I'd love to, is there a guide or cheat sheet somewhere to tell me how
to go about it. I'm not yet a Debian wizard.
Does this matter:
bruce:/home/simon# apt-get build-dep xorg xserver-xorg-video-ati
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree..
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:23:02PM +0100, Simon Brown wrote:
> On 13/09/06 21:48:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >However, xorg 7.1 is targetted for inclusion in etch.
> >It would be nice if people would build themselves a copy of the 7.1
> >server and their driver from experimental and test on alpha,
On 13/09/06 21:48:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
However, xorg 7.1 is targetted for inclusion in etch.
It would be nice if people would build themselves a copy of the 7.1
server and their driver from experimental and test on alpha, to check
whether it fixes whatever problems they're personally expe
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:26:39PM -0300, Geoff Martin wrote:
> I've checked myselft too, and Xorg continues to freeze the machine... This
> is VERY bad... Etch is scheduled for release and this problem persists...
However, xorg 7.1 is targetted for inclusion in etch.
It would be nice if people w
I've checked myselft too, and Xorg continues to freeze the machine... This
is VERY bad... Etch is scheduled for release and this problem persists...
Geoff
-Mensagem original-
De: Simon Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 11 de setembro de 2006 19:33
Para: debian-
27 matches
Mail list logo
