Re: Alpha SMP status

2006-12-21 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* James Andrewartha wrote: > Thanks again to the alpha maintainers, and extra thanks if you can > sneak a fix for bug 402253 in before etch (I even included a patch > ;-). Patch added, thanks. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: Alpha SMP status

2006-12-16 Thread James Andrewartha
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >>> May be it is running out of space for per cpu area. You can try by >>> increasing the PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM in include/linux/percpu.h and see if >>> get pass. I looked other 64 bit archs x86_64 and ia64 and they both have >>> different value. May be al

Re: Alpha SMP status

2006-12-12 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 10:55 -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:26:18AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 10:23 +0900, James Andrewartha wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Some of you may be aware that SMP has been broken on Alpha for most of > > > 2.6. A

Re: Alpha SMP status

2006-12-12 Thread Jay Estabrook
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:26:18AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 10:23 +0900, James Andrewartha wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Some of you may be aware that SMP has been broken on Alpha for most of > > 2.6. As of linux-image-2.6.18-3-smp, I'm pleased to report that it boots

Re: Alpha SMP status

2006-12-11 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 10:23 +0900, James Andrewartha wrote: > Hi all, > > Some of you may be aware that SMP has been broken on Alpha for most of > 2.6. As of linux-image-2.6.18-3-smp, I'm pleased to report that it boots > and runs acceptably because scsi_mod is compiled in (bug 369517). However,